User talk:Gfoley4

| edit count | edit summary usage

"The Crib" Talk Barnstars Contribs Sandbox Edit Counter Vector .js Street View Alternate account Header: v • d • e Welcome to Gfoley4's talkpage! This page was last edited by StickyNicky911 (talk • contribs) 13 years ago Archives 2010 February March June July August September October November December 2011 January February March April Block Hi there FOLEY, VASCO (217.129.65.5 IP) from Portugal here, yes i have merited this for a longtime, due to my summary behaviour. I have a bipolar disorder which makes it very hard to control myself when faced with: 1 - vandalism; 2 - unexplained removal of content. Keep up the good work (if you want me blocked, letting vandals do their deed, by all means), have a nice weekend - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Dear GFoley4: I'm Cliff, a/k/a User:Uploadvirus, and FYI ... I was the editor that made the (most) recent complaint, via User:Chzz, about the above-named editor/I.P that you issued the 24-hour block for. I came here to notify you that, after I posted a note to HIS talk page complaining about his long-term pattern of repeated disruptive edits and edit summaries, he IMMEDIATELY posted me a very civil, contrite, and positive note in response at my talk page. I accepted his apology in good faith, and was satisfied and somewhat hopeful of a positive outcome. I also let User:Chzz know of his nice response to my concerns. When I saw that it was you that had actually imposed the sanction, I wanted to thank you for what I feel was your very swift, just, and equitable actions herein. All that said, I was QUITE disappointed by his parenthetical remark to you above, "if you want me blocked, letting vandals do their deed, by all means". I'm NOT convinced of the contriteness, appropriate, or intelligence of that. Quite a SHAME! In any case, and again - thank you for that extra work. Let me know if I can be of service to you. Best regards: Cliff L. Knickerbocker, MS (talk) 03:05, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Back from the dead Cliff...My suspension is over, i have returned, will try to amend my ways even harder this time... i hope you are not as offended as User:Uploadvirus by some of the contents in my original message to you (the stuff in parenthesis), there i was merely venting my frustration on being (rightfully) blocked, which did not allow for my fight against vandalism (can't do much blocked, can i?). I have had people come to my page and call me every name in the book, just for reporting their vandalic ways, one "chap" was on my case for almost one year, reverting my daily edits and so...I was in no way offensive to you. That said (and i have also messaged Chzz and Virus with this note), sorry for any incovenience and keep up the good work - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Alright. I hope you don't get frustrated again! :) PS, I wasn't really offended by the comments made in parenthesis that you'd made. —GFOLEY FOUR— 20:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Uhhhh Hey, Gfoley, how's it going? Could I trouble you to explain this? Swarm X 18:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Right to vanish. He requested via IRC... —GFOLEY FOUR— 20:18, 14 April 2011 (UTC) As I assumed, but why'd you remove it five minutes later? This is all just out of curiosity, BTW :) Swarm X 20:31, 14 April 2011 (UTC) Consensus (on IRC) was against the personal note. —GFOLEY FOUR— 00:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Seriously? Good god. Swarm X 01:56, 15 April 2011 (UTC) Talkback Hello, Gfoley4. You have new messages at Rsteilberg's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Changed signature  Done; Thanks for the help changing the signature. —Rsteilberg talk 00:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC) No problem! Glad to help. —GFOLEY FOUR— 00:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Yshes Why did you remove their death threats without blocking them??? LiteralKa (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Block of 74.110.161.90 Thank you for blocking 74.110.161.90 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log). Whoever is using this IP address is basically harassing users by vandalizing our user and talk pages. He vandalized my user and talk page last month and came back today. It would be best to keep an eye on this IP so that once his block expires next month, you could immediately block him for longer periods (like 3-6 months) if he comes back to do same vandalism. Thank you again for blocking that vandal IP! November Hotel Romeo Hotel Sierra Two Zero One Zero ✈ 03:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Sure thing. I have their talk page on my watchlist... we'll see in a month. —GFOLEY FOUR— 03:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC) User talk:213.94.181.85 Why did you send me warning, I have not edited any pages today. Please tell me what i am supposed to have vandalized. 213.94.181.85 (talk) 16:29, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Vandal at large! Hi there FOLEY, VASCO here, It may be not easily noticeable by the person not familiar with soccer, but this Norwegian "user" (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/88.88.13.239) is engaging in vandalism. In infoboxes, he removes chunks of content without one word, he has already been warned in this new IP (he has had others, User:NuclearWarfare, no longer an admin, helped me deal with one of them), what can you do about it? This is vandalism, believe me... Attentively, thank you very much in advance (i have already reverted some of his stuff), from Portugal - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Warned user.. I am declining to block for now since they have not been very active lately. (Only 1 edit a day ago, a few edits 3 days after that) I do agree that this behavior is disruptive though. Please re-report if/when they make more "bad" edits. P.S. NuclearWarfare is an admin. —GFOLEY FOUR— 16:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Thanks for the on-sight reply man! Oops, my bad, last time i checked he was not, he must have been "re-promoted", kudos to him! :) --Vasco Amaral (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Make that vandalS, Foley!! Found this Colombian chap (see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/190.157.116.116), has also been warned, has not been active lately, but he has been more active than he should i might add. Again, you will have to trust my judgement when i say that, from what i found out in Joseba Etxeberria, he's a no good vandal (in the article i mentioned, it's lies lies and more lies this "user" inserted), period! Attentively again - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 17:20, 17 April 2011 (UTC) Yep. Again, I cannot block as there last edit was in February. I'll keep an eye on them though. Thanks for brining this to my attention. —GFOLEY FOUR— 17:23, 17 April 2011 (UTC) The Signpost: 18 April 2011 News and notes: Commons milestone; newbie contributions assessed; German community to decide on €200,000 budget; brief news In the news: Wikipedia accurate on US politics, plagiarized in court, and compared to Glass Bead Game; brief news WikiProject report: An audience with the WikiProject Council Features and admins: The best of the week Arbitration report: Case comes to a close after 3 weeks - what does the decision tell us? Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 05:56, 19 April 2011 (UTC) Talk:The Bad Girls Club (season 7) Hey, I've asked a question, but it is hidden inside of your box that you had created. Any way of exposing my question for it to be answered? AJona1992 (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)  Fixed Looks like a wikitable got in the way. —GFOLEY FOUR— 21:26, 19 April 2011 (UTC) Thanks, have a great day! AJona1992 (talk) 02:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC) Nice Page I Like All The Details StickyNicky911 (talk) 02:02, 22 April 2011 (UTC)