User talk:Zeality

; Archives
	Archive 1 (April 2005—May 2007);
	Archive 2 (June 2007—January 2011);
	Thanks to Mirlen and Ryu Kaze for the templates. ZeaLitY [ DREAM - REFLECT ] 22:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh NO, it's ZeaLitY's talk page!

Happy Zeality's Day!

Zeality has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian,
so I've officially declared today as Zeality's Day!
For being a great person and awesome Wikipedian,
enjoy being the star of the day, Zeality!

Signed, Neutralhomer

A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, click here. Have a Great Day...Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above is given on behalf of User:Maclean25. - Neutralhomer • Talk • 05:04, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it

Mitaphane got back to you on the Anachronox scans, in case you missed it. I still had his talk page watchlisted from when I made my last request. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 20:34, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good to see that you're back in action. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Amazing work! I can't believe it's finished. I have little doubt that this article will be the new high-water mark for VG article quality; all other VG FAs will be compared to it. I can't imagine you'll have any trouble at FAC. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Good lord man, the development and reception sections could almost stand on their own as independent articles! You really go all out when you write these things; I look forward to the FAC! Good job! --Pres N 21:57, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Anachronox

Hi I just want to know when you are gonna responed to some of the comment to Anachronox's Peer Review? GamerPro64 (talk) 17:25, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Anachronox

Sounds good. I hope all of that can be done in time, but, considering how quickly you rebuilt the article, I wouldn't be too surprised if you managed it. If I can find the time, I'll give the other five copyeditors a hand with Development and Reception. Of course, that's assuming that there'll be anything left to tweak; it seems like you're one of those rare Wikipedians who can simultaneously generate vast amounts of content and write FA-worthy prose. Good luck. JimmyBlackwing (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to take part in a study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 01:23, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zeality. I appreciate for completing the survey two weeks ago. I would like to return your favor with a reward of an online gift card with no condition. Please leave your email address in the final version of survey of my project. In addition, you can get chance to win $50 worth of gift card. It takes only 10 minutes to complete the final version because it contains only 35 questions. If you have Wikipedia friends, please introduce this survey to them. Thank you so much. cooldenny (talk) 13:36, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]