Jump to content

User talk:Mo ainm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Homebirdni (talk | contribs) at 10:04, 25 May 2011 (→‎Please....). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello, now be nice and see below.

Please place new messages at the bottom of this page. I will respond to comments here, unless there's a better place for them. Please read the following helpful hints, as well as our talk page guidelines before posting:

  • I am not an administrator. That means I cannot block, unblock, delete, undelete, protect or unprotect. You can report vandalism here and suspicious usernames here. Go here if you want something deleted.
  • I reserve the right to remove inappropriate comments. This includes vandalism and trolling. I also reserve the right to refactor ugly HTML, or to trim unnecessary stuff (e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article to Article).
  • If you're here to inform me of a mistake I made while on recent changes patrol, please indicate which article is concerned by enclosing the title of the article in two sets of square brackets: [[example article]]. If you're an IP and got reverted for deleting text, make sure you use an edit summary next time.
START A NEW SECTION ON THIS PAGE

Change in the Metapedia article

Why have you reverted the change? Have you even looked at the discussion page? The very book that is referenced calls it a white nationalist website, and calls its "primary movement" WN. 84.136.241.77 (talk) 17:40, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:British Isles

Template:British Isles has been protected to allow for discussion of its title. It has been possible to change the title of this template on a page-by-page basis. Titles that have been used on different pages being:

  • British Isles
  • British-Irish Council area
  • Great Britain, Ireland, and related islands
  • British Isles — or Great Britain, Ireland, and related islands

A user has raised the question of whether this practice is a violation of NPOV.

A list of alternative solutions (aside form those being reverted between) is invited also. --RA (talk) 21:03, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flag deletions

Mo, I see you are deleting flags all over the place. Just so that I'm clear, what part of the flag MOS was being contravenend by the flags in this article Taipei Symphony Orchestra? WizOfOz (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WizOfOz I'm sure I have already pointed out to you in other articles where using flags goes against WP guidelines. Do you really need Mo ainm to do the same? Bjmullan (talk) 22:32, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Wiz the flags were deleted from that article under MOSFLAG namely "Do not use flags to indicate locations of birth, residence, or death" Mo ainm~Talk 08:18, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Entaco speedy

Hi,

I declined your A7 nomination for Entaco because the article makes a plausible claim of significance. You may want to consider WP:PROD or WP:AFD. RJaguar3 | u | t 15:55, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of curiosity what is the credible claim it makes? Mo ainm~Talk 16:35, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Throughout its history Entaco has been recognised as being at the forefront in bringing innovation into the hand sewing needle, hardware, medical and fishing markets." RJaguar3 | u | t 18:38, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sure it was deleted in any way. Mo ainm~Talk 22:41, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Northern Ireland

Howdy Mo. Count the reverts, I haven't breached 3RR, nor do I intend to. GoodDay (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have made 3 reverts in 4 hours and you don't have to go over 3 reverts to get blocked, the article is also subject to 1RR, which you have breached. Mo ainm~Talk 18:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know it was subject to 1RR. GoodDay (talk) 18:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It sure is along with nearly every article to do with NI and The Troubles. Mo ainm~Talk 18:24, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, my blunder. GoodDay (talk) 18:31, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, I just read the Arbcom ruling, now & indeed, I should be blocked. I'm not sure if you're suppose to report me or if an administrator merely blocks. Anyways, I won't fight such a block, if it comes my way. GoodDay (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I won't be reporting you in all honesty I couldn't be arsed and don't need the drama. Mo ainm~Talk 18:54, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please....

Please don't delete my posts on other peoples talk pages. Its bad form.

I simply posted the warning to remind O_Fenian of the 3RR and that in the event of an edit war to first discuss the changes on the topic talk page.

Its quite funny because O_Fenian loves quoting the rules of wiki but when he is asked to do the same he simply ignores it. As you have also made an edit with discussion would you mind discussion the change first. That is how wikipedia works...isn't it?Homebirdni (talk) 09:52, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are starting an edit war on another users page, when a post is removed you assume that they read it repeatedly adding it is pointless and will lead to blocks. Mo ainm~Talk 09:58, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I guess in future, if you see an edit war, just avoid it. Don't join in.Homebirdni (talk) 10:04, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Mo_ainm&oldid=430819045"