User talk:Eisfbnore/Archive 2
|
|
WT:Norway dispute
Hello Eisfbnore. An SPI could be tried, but I need to know why this is trolling. What is the background of the dispute? You link to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sju hav/Archive. Is this someone who is constantly re-adding the name of the same person to articles? How does this relate to the new addition by Kollibris at WT:Norway, where he is asking if there are articles about Knut Braa? Is this connected to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bjørn Sagvolden? Is the sockmaster trying to promote Sagvolden's case? I have looked at no:Kategori:Mistenkte sokkedukker for Sju hav. Is there a sockpuppet investigation in the no.wiki that we could link to ? Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- As stated by 3s in the SPI, the individual behind these socks is either Bjørn Sagvolden or just a random person supporting him in his lawsuits agains the Norwegian government. Please take a look at the last section of their posting at WT:NORWAY ("Winning a lawsuit against Norway"). Also note that the user is considering WT:Norway a free port for POV-pushing of people suing the State of Norway, which they have been blocked from doing at no.wiki. --Eisfbnore talk 16:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- How did you immediately know that this was him, when you saw him post at WT:Norway. Was it the fact he was posting about a claim against the government? I'm thinking ahead to how we will deal with such things in the future. Even a block of Kollibris wouldn't stop the creation of new socks, so there should be a consensus about what to do to protect WT:Norway. Kollibris was auto-confirmed, so semiprotection of the page wouldn't help. EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, it was because of the government thing, the style of posting and the "[I] fear of being blocked if I ask the question on the Norwegian website" claim. I haven't been too involved in this case at no.wiki, (KEN (talk · contribs) and 3s (talk · contribs) have) I just reverted the posting to keep WT:Norway free of battlegrounding. But I honestly don't know how WT:Norway ought to be protected. Any ideas? --Eisfbnore talk 17:14, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- How did you immediately know that this was him, when you saw him post at WT:Norway. Was it the fact he was posting about a claim against the government? I'm thinking ahead to how we will deal with such things in the future. Even a block of Kollibris wouldn't stop the creation of new socks, so there should be a consensus about what to do to protect WT:Norway. Kollibris was auto-confirmed, so semiprotection of the page wouldn't help. EdJohnston (talk) 17:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)