Jump to content

Talk:Macroeconomics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 41.186.12.249 (talk) at 14:52, 20 June 2011 (→‎can i know more about the goals of macro economics?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconBusiness Start‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconEconomics C‑class Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
CThis article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment by 80.161.140.17

      Four-rate formula and Exchange-rate Formula?

Four-rate formula explains the mathematical relation of change rate in price, wage, interest rate and GDP (or GNP).

Exchange rate reqlll8888888888formula help to calculate exchange rate between different money with different productivity.

This book introduces a new theory of price system and a general theory of interest rate.

Please read a new mook:

THING AND ITS LAW, Chapter 3: Productive force ( the theory of price system)ISBN 1-58939-525-5. Published 2003 by Virtualbookworm.com Publishing Inc.

xiaozhong zhai

Comment by 203.146.108.8

People who edit this page should know something about economics. Do you think that Lucas would have received the nobel prize for simply a suggesting?

Furthermore, New Keysian economics does not provide strong micro foundations to Keysian economics.

Also, these so called schools of economic thought have no bearing on relevant macroeconomics and are very outdated and not used by anyone who knows economics anymore.

can i know more about the goals of macro economics?

am a young economist and i wish to ask certain questions on national income yes you can

I know nothing about economics, but it's not clear to me that link to short-run links to the correct article. It doesn't seem related.

Innovation Economics

Uh, while there was a substantial literature that started in the 90's that focused on long term growth and innovation, I'm not sure that calling it an "alternative school of macroeconomics" is accurate - it was just one strand of Macro lit.radek (talk) 19:09, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The list of "three approaches" is completely nonstandard (and unsupported by citations). Rinconsoleao (talk) 11:20, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the innovation economics as a school of macro thought.--Bkwillwm (talk) 17:42, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

need answers

investigate the requirement at the different stages of growth of an organization? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.0.7.1 (talk) 12:06, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

investigate the requirement at the different stages of growth of an organisation?

investigate the requirement at the different stages of growth of an organization? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.0.7.3 (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Circulation in macroeconomics

This image may be better than the current one. I translated it from the French and Spanish versions. Thoughts? --Shinkansen Fan (talk) 20:09, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]