Jump to content

User talk:MadeYourReadThis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Generacy (talk | contribs) at 12:54, 24 June 2011 (asked if TriDAR references okay.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I am not an admin, I'm an editor like you. I did not delete your page and I cannot restore it. If you are here to comment on a page I marked with maintenance concerns or for deletion please read the following first and click on the link in the yellow box below to leave me a message if you have additional questions:

If you concerned about the speed that I and other New Page Patrollers tag newly created articles, consider how we are to know that you are not done with your contribution and then read for ideas on how let others know you plan to add more to the article very soon.

STS-135 TriDAR removal

Hi RadioFan, I found a reference for TriDAR being on STS-135, but didn't have a chance to add in the reference before you reverted my edits. Would this suffice: http://www.nasaspaceflight.com/2011/06/sts-135-final-flights-timeline-takes-shape/. Please let me know if you're okay with me adding back my changes. Thanks!Generacy (talk) 20:39, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't impress me as much of a reference. It mentions that the TriDAR is among the payloads on 135 but nothing else. The section removed had a lot more information in it. I'd like to see some better references for the material that was in the section. This would resolve original research concerns.--RadioFan (talk) 21:09, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The other information in the section was taken from the TriDAR wiki page. No original research was performed. :/ 216.239.77.204 (talk) 01:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The references used on TriDAR can certainly be used on STS-135 as well. The problem was that it was completely unreferenced. Also I dont think a dedicated section is warranted here, it gives TriDAR undue emphasis and implies that this is a major payload for the mission, which is not the case.--RadioFan (talk) 10:41, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so if I add in the references from TriDAR, may I put it back in STS-135? Regarding undue emphasis, could you please describe what your criteria is for major payload? Autonomous Rendezvous & Docking test flight payloads have been listed on [[1]], [[2]], [[3]], [[4]], and [[5]].