User talk:AndyTheGrump

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:

Please post your new topic at the bottom of this page.
Please sign and date your entry by inserting "~~~~" at the end.
Please specify a descriptive "Subject/headline" for a new topic and separate subtopics by ===heading=== lines, if needed.
Please indent your posts with one more ":" than what you are replying to, i.e. begin with ":" if replying to an existing topic and "::" if replying to a reply.

I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.

⇒ Start a new Talk topic.

Archives:

Sept 2010, Oct 2010, Nov 2010, Dec 2010.

Jan 2011, Feb 2011, Mar 2011, Apr 2011, May 2011, Jun 2011. July 2011. Aug 2011. Sept 2011,

Notification of request for a block

Notification that you are mentioned here Cptnono (talk) 04:58, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This should be fun... AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:01, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fun ended early with your edit. I will be modifying it and asking you to watch NPA if you were attempting to assert that I was a fan of Beck. Cptnono (talk) 05:02, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll assert nothing, other than that you should read before you write... AndyTheGrump (talk) 05:04, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lewontin's Argument

Fllowing the recen [1] our participation in the dicussion about the title and scope of the article will be apreciated.·ʍaunus·snunɐw· 01:06, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm new to adding content to wikipedia. I'm willing to discuss my proposed change regarding the Oslo killer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fiolou (talk • contribs) 22:36, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Read WP:OR, and then discuss this on the article talk page if you still think it can be included (it won't be). AndyTheGrump (talk) 22:42, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

r&i

please note the recent debate on the subject.-- mustihussain (talk) 15:55, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - it is on my watchlist. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SlowhandBlues = Bentheadvocate

I requested a checkuser to be run and that was what came out. That explains various things ... Mathsci (talk) 16:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I had my suspicions from early on - I'd been involved in the Kingston University debate, where Bentheadvocate first surfaced. I hope I'm not being stalked, though I suppose that will make the next sock/troll easier to find. AndyTheGrump (talk) 16:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Steven Krivit and the Energy Catalyzer

"But Steven Krivit is still working to..."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uX0vcU4iedQ

Andy,

I am Francesco, i.e. the "black sheep" that reported the interview of Giuseppe Levi made by Daniele Passerini.
In my opinion, and according to the information I have collected until now, the reports made by Krivit are a T-O-T-A-L hoax
and this hoax will be dismantled very soon...

--79.20.140.196 (talk) 21:02, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am not the slightest bit interested in your opinion, unless it is backed up by reliable sources - I'd be interested to learn why you make this claim though. Are you connected in any way with Rossi, or with Defkalion? AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No. But I am Italian, therefore I can have a more direct access on what is going on.

--79.20.140.196 (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If and when anything is published, it may merit inclusion in the article, but for now, we can only go on what we have. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:23, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Post Scriptum

and also access to non-Italian sources:

"What Drives Steven Krivit?", written in 2008 by Brian Josephson.

http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/articles/NET1.html

--79.20.140.196 (talk) 21:40, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm quite prepared to believe that Professor Josephson has said some uncomplimentary things about Krivet - he's said uncomplimentary things about me too, on the 'Catalyzer' article talk page (though to be fair to him, I wasn't at my most polite either). Personal animosity isn't evidence of anything else though. Unless you have anything of actual significance to the article, from published reliable sources, I consider this conversation closed. AndyTheGrump (talk) 21:53, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I have taken his 'nickname' just in case he tries anything.