Jump to content

Talk:Bye Bye (Mariah Carey song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Calvin999 (talk | contribs) at 21:25, 10 August 2011 (GA Review: Another thing.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 14:13, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it well written?
    A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
    B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
  2. Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
    A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
    B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
    C. It contains no original research:
    D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
    B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
  4. Is it neutral?
    It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
  5. Is it stable?
    It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
  6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
    B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
  • Info box
  1. Order of writers is different to that of the Lead.
  • Lead info
  1. No issues.
  • Background
  1. No issues.
  • Composition
  1. (Vocal range is wrong)
  2. No other issues.
  • Critical reception
  1. "In his review of E=MC2" → You need a "²" here.
  2. "it heavily to "Don't Forget About Us"" → Doesn't need to be wiki-linked again, it was linked in the Composition section.
  • Chart performance
  1. "the united Kingdom" → Need a capital 'U'
  2. "select part of Europe" → "parts", not "part"
  3. "in its third.[52]" → "In its third week" ?
  4. "each country in charted" → think you mean 'it'.
  5. " It debuted and peaked at number 70 in Germany, and debuted at number eighty-eight on the UK Singles Chart.[48][49] Six weeks later, on July 5, 2008, the song peaked at number thirty, due to the release of the song's music video.[50]" → 70 should be seventy, and I assume you are talking about the UK when you say it peaked at thirty? Calvin NaNaNaC'mon!
    up. Right you are!--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 18:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Music video - Background
  1. No issues.
  • Music video - Synopsis
  1. No issues.
  • Live performances
  1. "Carey took to Europe to perform on several programs" → You only mention T4, so you should re-word the sentence to fit in with the United Kindgom, as you give two promo appearances for the UK.
  2. "Tamara ones of" → ? Not sure this is mean't to be.
  3. "one of which included a live rendition of "Bye Bye"." Where ? If you are talking about T4, when you should mention with T4 in the same sentence. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 21:25, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Track listings and formats
  1. No issues.
  • Credits and personnel
  1. No issues.
  • Release history
  1. Is there no release history table you can put here? For radio adds, digital downloads, CDs?
  • References
  1. One dead link (Ref 16)
    I know you're not going to like this, but its not dead. I don't know why it comes up like that. Click on the link in the article :)--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 23:39, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Why does it do that? Maybe it you remove it, then add it back in and format it again, it will trick the system lol. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 23:41, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Trust me. it won't. I have that same issue on the Mimi page. Its just a simple error :S--CallMeNathanTalk2Me 03:16, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another great article, on hold. Calvin NaNaNaC'mon! 16:14, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]