Jump to content

User talk:Day000Walker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Lukas.staniszewski (talk | contribs) at 16:44, 17 September 2011 (→‎New Comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

November 2008

Welcome to my talk page

Feel free to post your feedbacks.Arshan abbas 08:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have put my page 'Subsea Valley' for deletion. It is in good intention, and I am willing to make it as reliable as possible, however there are limited sources which I can add as references. It has been a research project I have done, and I will further update this page. Please tell me, what else is needed. I am very new to editing in Wikipedia. Thanks!

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Great Mosque of Cordoba has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. EdBever (talk) 18:53, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Timeline of antisemitism‎. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. dougweller (talk) 19:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

I would be happy to adopt you! In future, if you have any problems, questions or anything you are wondering about, please leave a message for me on my adoption sub-page and I will get back to you as soon as possible.

Just some notes about your message: when posting on talk pages, please start a new section at the bottom of the page. You can do this automatically by clicking the "New Section" tab at the top of the page. Also, please sign your posts with four tildes - ~~~~ - to automatically generate a signature and timestamp which will link back to your user page. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 10:32, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied to your message at User:Strdst grl/adoption. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 17:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I moved you message to User:Strdst grl/adoption and replied there. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 15:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jamia Live

A tag has been placed on Jamia Live requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. BelovedFreak 16:02, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New message

I have left a new message for you at User:Strdst grl/adoption. This is the last time I will leave a note here, so please watch the page from now on. strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 10:03, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contents

To be continued

Chris Hull (physicist)

Arshan, it is recommended by Wikipedia:Stubs that stub tags go at the bottom of an article, so I am moving the tag you placed here. --Merond e 21:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samsung YP-S3JAB/XAA

I did not delete this Samsung YP-S3JAB/XAA because it was nominated as a spam. There was some promotional text, which I removed. Unless the article is almost entirely advertising, then it does not qualify for the db-spam. db-policy is totally inappropriate for an article. Nominating an article multiple times for speedy deletion can become disruptive. So you should use AFD to get a debated consensus. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Another point is that the db tags for articles go on the article page, not on the talk page. Only specific delete tags for talk pages go on the talk pages, such as for G8 talk page for article that does not exist. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Pune/Invite

Speedy deletion nomination of Castle Age

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Castle Age, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Castle Age and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 17:07, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Castle Age

The article Castle Age has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN web game, fails WP:WEB notability. Previously deleted twice for this reason, but last deletion was in 2009...tho it isn't obvious that much has changed since then to support a current claim to notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Syrthiss (talk) 18:30, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is different from the page that was deleted in 2009. It is about a Facebook game. I was searching about it on Wikipedia and was unable to find any cues. With my sole experience I drafted it in my sand box and finally posted it here. I think it should not be deleted, as it is there to serve a purpose to impart knowledge about this game. I am seeking editors to improve the quality of article and making it more helpful to the needy. I have drafted how to play this game here and not just described it. I would like to welcome you to put your contribution.Arshan.abbas (talk) 18:54, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Castle Age FAC

I have removed the FAC nomination, since there is absolutely no way that Castle Age meets the FA criteria, particularly when the article is currently at AfD. Standard procedure is to delete such nominations, so I have done that as well. Regards, BencherliteTalk 21:08, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

___

Adoption

Hi Arshan.abbas. I see that you had an outstanding adoption request, though you've been adopted in the past by a now inactive user. Since you are currently inactive, I've removed the request, but feel free to create a new one upon your return. WormTT · (talk) 08:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well we can't have that now can we :) I do a lot of mentorring/adoption work, and would be happy to help out. Have you been told that your edits are sub par? I think you'll find that they're generally not, but if you can use me as a point of reference for questions in the future. What sort of mentorring where you hoping for? WormTT · (talk) 15:23, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Done and done. Go forth, be bold. I'll be watching. Let me know when you have something in a sandbox that you'll like me to review, and good luck. WormTT · (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011


Hi Day000Walker,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

Talkback

Hello, Day000Walker. You have new messages at TParis's talk page.
Message added 12:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

v/r - TP 12:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hi Day000Walker. I see we've chatted about adoption before! I know I had a snoop at your edits for a month or so after you requested it and didn't see anything particularly bad. But I take it you'd like a more formal process? I see you've already answered the first lot of questions! Well, if you can give me a couple of days, as I'm quite busy at the moment, I'll try to get you set up with an adoption page, where we can go through things, you can ask questions and so on. Any queries in the mean time, let me know. WormTT · (talk) 18:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I would like to wait, and thanks for sparing time forme.--Day000Walker (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Day000Walker. You have new messages at Ravichandar84's talk page.
Message added 16:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:13, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Day000Walker. You have new messages at Ravichandar84's talk page.
Message added 16:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

The EnforcerOffice of the secret service 16:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Day000Walker&oldid=450993486"