Jump to content

User talk:Elizium23

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 序名三 (talk | contribs) at 03:51, 13 November 2011 (→Vandalism: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Elizium23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Merry Christmas

PanydThe muffin is not subtle wishes you a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! May this be a time of peace, joy and goodwill towards men.

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:Wikipedia:CONTRIB/Holidays/Christmas1}} to your friends' talk pages.

UBUNTU OPERATING SYSTEM

You can't be serious. You could accuse me of vandalism, but you'd be lying to yourself and others. If you have a problem with what I write, please address the writing. Otherwise people might misinterpret your accusations as bullying. There are no shortcuts in life. It's users like you that make me hate wikipedia! And I mean that in the nicest possible way. AwesomeMachine (talk) 11:03, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:TPO. It is considered impolite to edit others' talk page comments, even for grammar and spelling. I know you were well-intentioned in changing just one letter, but it's not acceptable. Elizium23 (talk) 13:53, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Barcelona

I'm editing the content of Barcelona very well.Since this article was created I ever edited the content qualit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnau Poveda Mira (talk • contribs) 22:39, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not doing a disruptive editing. I only edit very well Barcelona. I edit in other languages this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arnau Poveda Mira (talk • contribs) 22:41, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IP editor

The IP editor is not blocked for being a sockpuppet of a blocked user. He might still be misbehaving. Or it might be another user, I dunno. DS (talk) 04:55, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate you responding however:

You cut out the other 95% of the article, which is emphatically /not/ taken from any of the sources you cite. Since all of the sources you cite have the same copy, you should have checked whether this was released as on authorized blurb by the PR team. If that's not acceptable, then, yes, a copyright violation has occured: for 3 sentences, not the whole article!

You didn't edit the talk page at all to show what and why you've changed (since effectively blanking an article deserves that, at least), and you didn't justify why you didn't remove the intro text-by your logic it too deserves a copyright check!

Your actions are heavy handed at best, but reflect poorly on commitment to quality, given that the template does not cite 2 of the 3 sources you claim are the owners.

The correct template to use is {{copy-paste}}, since it accurately refers to what's happened here: someone's lifted a paragraph from these sites, and it should be replaced.

Thegeneralguy (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: use the copy-vio for just the Plot section. Replacing the entire article is imprecise and wrong. Thegeneralguy (talk) 01:11, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No, I didn't cut out the other 95% of the article: using a bare {{copyvio}} template can do that, but as usual, I used </div> at the end of the template to enable viewing of the rest of the article. And none of the clerks at WP:Copyright problems have complained before about my template usage, so your idea is new to me. And yes, I probably should have used the talk page. Elizium23 (talk) 02:53, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The documentation for {{copy-paste}} implies that it should be used instead of blanking the copyrighted text. It says: If you have strong reason to believe that the source material is copyrighted, please instead follow the procedure at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. That is where it advises to use {{copyvio}}. I probably should have just reverted/removed the offending paragraph instead, because it was a recent addition. Elizium23 (talk) 02:56, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lizzie McGuire

Okay. It just I try to identify which TV show should fall to the feminist catagory, that's all. Please don't block me.--NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:33, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You should really seek consensus and find reliable sources that support your assertions before you go adding categories to 15 articles at a time. I had to clean up ten of them and the mentions of feminism in the other five are tenuous at best. Elizium23 (talk) 22:47, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, it just that I am still new at this "catagory" thing. I just created Category:Television series set in the Yuan Dynasty and Category:Television series set in the Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms with no apparent problems, so I guess I got carry away. Plus, I am a fan of feminist fiction, either movies or television series. --NeoBatfreak (talk) 22:53, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine. It looks like you started small and there is possibly less scrutiny on Chinese television series than on more popular American ones. I hope your category survives deletion, because I believe it is useful, especially if you can get some with sources. Elizium23 (talk) 02:17, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe that there are alot of TV series around the world which has feminism theme. However, many have failed to identify it. I only can categorize what I'm sure of but the rest would hopefully up to the users. By the way, I assumes that you read A Weaver on the Horizon while you clean up what I've contributed. What do you think on the summary I've wrote, is it understandable? I ask because I typically has issues with grammer --NeoBatfreak (talk) 02:39, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Talk:Melissa Scott (pastor), you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 22:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I did include proper sources. Here are a few examples:

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4508933 http://www.angelfire.com/pa3/holytestament/melissa.html http://www.patheos.com/blogs/unreasonablefaith/2009/05/pastor-melissa-scott-porn-star/ http://mathgeneration.wordpress.com/2009/05/21/pastor-melissa-scott-i-love-this-story/ http://www.barbiebridgesvod.com/studio/5/Barbie-Bridges-Ent-/?ct=2059 http://www.glamourfantasy.com/preview/barbibridges.html http://www.anorak.co.uk/209326/news/us-evengelist-melissa-scott-was-porn-star-barbie-bridges.html/ http://www.chemistrydaily.com/chemistry/Melissa_Pastore

序名三「Jyonasan」 TalkStalk 03:51, 13 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Elizium23&oldid=460387770"