User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
TalkbackHello, Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry. You have new messages at Lhb1239's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. Invitation to take part in Wikipedia survey
Sent by Rcsprinter123 (talk) at 21:55, 17 October 2024 UTC [refresh] on behalf of Wikimedia Surveys using AWB. Salted Article for Angel.comHello there--I was pointed here by Phearson and JohnCD. I work for a marketing firm that's representing Angel, of Angel.com (full disclosure on my user page). In 2009, you salted Angel's article (it was Angel.com) because it had been recreated frequently by Kazuwiki, a user with a spammy history. JohnCD userfied the old article for me at User:Socialmedia2011/Angel.com and I'm just starting to work on updating it so that it lives up to Wikipedia quality and COI standards. It's nowhere near ready to be restored, but I wanted to reach out to let you know that I'm approaching this again and trying to get as much help from the Wiki community as possible to get this back up. Angel meets notability requirements with press from places such as Forbes and Information Week so it definitely merits a page. Would you be willing to provide feedback and, when it's ready, restore this article? Let me know, and thanks for your time! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
Awesome, a few days response is pretty much what we're dealing with too--it's time consuming to sift through old press to form these articles, I don't know how you veteran Wikipedians do it! If I get help from a few other editors to get the article up to snuff, would you be willing to simply restore it? Let me know and best of luck with the fundraising. Socialmedia2011 (talk) 21:57, 7 November 2011 (UTC) Alright, I've made a few edits. It's shrunk down. Let me know if you see anything/the lack of anything that would stand in the way of getting this back up. Thanks! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 19:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Sorry for the confusion, just wanted to note that Phearson has moved the article here Articles_for_creation/Angel.com. I'm not sure if you have to play a role in getting it restored or what. Thanks for any help in advance! Socialmedia2011 (talk) 21:51, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Hey. I see that you removed a vast majority of this article saying that it was unsourced and possibly libelous. In fact i took the time to reference several different sources including published first-person accounts in a magazine. I also referenced the recounting of said story on the radio and attributed some of the facts to other main-stream media sources. I'd be fine if you believe that certain facts taken from those two sources are not sufficiently reliable, but essentially blanking the page as if the sources don't exist doesn't seem to be very fair. Please let me know your rational. --Mblumber (talk) 14:08, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
Meghan.reilly/Chicago2011/SquarePotato failling to grasp the nature of their blockYou may wish to take a look at User talk:Chicago2011 and this comment on my talk page. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 14:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
Typo in navbar?Hey, I was trying to go through your archives to get to that image I linked you a while ago (it was surprisingly hard to find it the first time). I notice that the image link in your navbar points to "/Archive," not "/Archives," so that it takes a user to the first entry in the archive, rather than the index. (The text that says archives goes to "/Archives" and thus to the index). A bug perhaps? Thanks, Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 19:32, 11 November 2011 (UTC) ps i'm not stalking you i swear Thanks for coming on Sunday!Thanks for coming on Sunday, was good to see you = ;) Mthe (talk) 00:33, 15 November 2011 (UTC) Removal of LGBT subsectionHi there! My name is Andrew, I'm on the current committee for Unity Bangor (LGBT) and I'm the previous Sexuality Equality Senator for the Student Union.Please forgive me if my formatting or mode of response is not in the correct style for Wikipedia (I have just made the account to comment on this specific issue). I agree with your statement that the LGBT society is "no more important than any other society", as all societies should be equal. However, each society has the option to create a post in this page and (on a personal note) I believe the post to be informative and valuable (this being a personal note because the Section on this page was one of the very first things I looked at when considering Bangor University) I have reinstated the section, as I believe its entry to be valid. May I make a request? I value your opinion and I'm more than willing to discuss this issue with you, however my familiarity with Wikipedia comments etc is really lacking. Would it be possible for you to email me personally and we can discuss any problems you have or arrange a compromise that should satisfy both parties? Before any further edits or removals that is. :) My personal email is: Psub25@bangor.ac.uk Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew gadie (talk • contribs) 00:44, 15 November 2011 (UTC) |