Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jaume Cañellas Galindo (2nd nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

First nomination was closed with no consensus because of too much off-topic content.
After having asked for sources several times, no sources have been provided for most of the "important content", such as publications
Most of the sources are primary sources (original scan of academic degrees, ...) (WP:NOR)
No independent secondary reliable source which talks about Jaume Cañellas Galindo directly in detail (and not just as a trivial mention) provided.
Even with appropriate references, the current content of the article does not reflect enough notability to be admitted in an encyclopaedia.
Last time sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry and many SPA were used to push to keep this article. I won't talk about these topics any more. I'll just flag them with the appropriate template.--Xtv - (my talk) - (que dius que què?) 11:26, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No proper reference to verify the person. Also the article lacks many information . --C h i n n Z ^{(talk | Contrib)} 11:14, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Despite the long paragraphs of first this, pioneering that, there's no satisfaction of ACADEMIC or related guidelines that I can see -- though I stand ready to be corrected (with specificity please, and no sockpuppets need apply). EEng (talk) 22:18, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]