Jump to content

User talk:ECLYPIA™

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ECLYPIA™ (talk | contribs) at 03:02, 27 December 2011. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

ECLYPIA™ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2= Account Hacked [[User:ECLYPIA™|ECLYPIA™]] ([[User talk:ECLYPIA™#top|talk]]) 03:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1= Account Hacked [[User:ECLYPIA™|ECLYPIA™]] ([[User talk:ECLYPIA™#top|talk]]) 03:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1= Account Hacked [[User:ECLYPIA™|ECLYPIA™]] ([[User talk:ECLYPIA™#top|talk]]) 03:02, 27 December 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

December 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Dr.K. ‎, you may be blocked from editing. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:Dr.K. ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 00:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop your edits, take a deep breath, calm down, and try and co-operate with other editors. Your current behaviour is only going to get you banned. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 00:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talkcontribs) - 00:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ECLYPIA™ (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

<Account was hacked and was accused as a vandal>

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, compromised accounts cannot be unblocked. --Kinu t/c 00:23, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.