Jump to content

Talk:PKP class ET21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 70.137.130.74 (talk) at 11:06, 4 January 2012 (tractive effort). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconTrains: Locomotives Start‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated projects or task forces:
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Locomotives task force.

Not good english

(His english better than my polish)

Does "ET21 is a first post-war locomotive." mean

  • is the first post-war loco?
  • an early post-war loco?

Change

  • Designing works started in 1955.

To

  • Design work started in 1955.

Or

  • Design started in 1955.


Tabletop 06:41, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Difference between subclass?

What is difference between first batch of the ET21 (01-69) and the second batch (70-658)?

Tabletop 06:43, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tractive effort

Please the tractive effort is 145 kN cont. and it is 178 kN from zero. The original spec here

http://web.archive.org/web/20070911210603/http://www.kolej.pl/tabor/ET21/dane_tech.html

gives the values in kg, which is technically incorrect. You have to multiply by 9.81 to arrive a kN. google translate handles this incorrectly. 70.137.130.74 (talk) 11:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]