User talk:Mstislavl

Михайлова

Призеры национальных чемпионатов значимы, что ж это Вы Михайлову на быстрое удаление? Serebr (talk)

WP:AB. And I am sorry that you appear to be not significant enough for a Wikipedia article :)--Mstislavl (talk) 08:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

РуВики

Добрый день. Пож-та, поясните, для чего Вы теперь ещё и переблокировали меня без права отправки писем. Никакими провокациями через почту я не занимался, а всего лишь попросил Вас удалить мою ЛС в Рувики (т.к. до блокировки она была удалена, ещё с 1-го мая, а вы её зачем-то восстановили 15 августа). На мой взгляд, я написал в достаточно вежливой форме, но если чем-то вас задел, приношу извинения. Так что, ещё раз прошу удалить мою ЛС согласно критерию быстрого удаления У1 (по запросу владельца), и переблокировать мою учётную запись обратно с возможностью отправки писем (поскольку я не использовал википочту с целью нарушений). Тем более, эта блокировка нарушает решение АК по ru:ВП:ИСК287. Надеюсь на Ваше понимание. --Stoljaroff1987 (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Why do you deleted my article Stone Cold Crazy in Russian Wikipedia?--Rock It! (Prime Jive) (talk) 12:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Russian wikipedia

Hi Victoria. I suggest you redraft the section yourself, correcting the inaccuracies. I have to admit my innate bias is to remove any apparent self-censorship of Russian institutions, which was my action here. Comparing the Russian Ground Forces page with the talk section of the Ru:wiki Ground Forces page (people trying to portray the Ground Forces more accurately) will give you some idea of my background on this issue. But please go ahead and fix it.. be bold!! Kind regards from Aotearoa New Zealand. Buckshot06 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the reply, I'll try. Our trolls successfully exploit bad reputation of Russian political institutions transposing it to the in-wiki situation. Which is ironic because they are often very pro-government, pro-Stalinist even. Greeting from the UK.--Victoria (talk) 10:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on book review

Hi Mstislav, thanks for you comment on the Signpost book review - I have moved it to Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-10-04/Book review, as it is more likely to be read there.

Reagle himself commented about the slightly weird Amazon review here. You may also be interested in this discussion. Or not ;)

Good luck with your fellowship work, it sounds like a really interesting and important project!

Regards, HaeB (talk) 12:06, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help. --Victoria (talk) 17:32, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Score updated in multilingual challenge

Hi we added your score to the "Wright Challenge" page. Hope you are enjoying the challenge - we have had a lot of Russian and Belarusian entries. Is this your publicity? Victuallers (talk) 16:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - I think it's a brilliant idea. I am not in it for the score, though but for bridging the gap between the projects. What do you mean by " your publicity"?--Victoria (talk) 18:06, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your contributions so far. You and the others are doing an amazing job.

Notice that there's a new barnstar being awarded to those Wikipedians or teams who reach 72 points. I hope you'll work on with us. But we need your help, if you're willing. We'd like to spread this challenge to some other participants. Would you dare to go to the main talk page of any other Wikipedias, maybe other Slavic languages (we don't have anyone doing Ukrainian), or to any friends' talk pages if you think they would be interested, and add a one-line message and link to the challenge page? (I think Victuallers, in his message above, was guessing that you had already done this!) It would be good now to get some more participants. Hope you can help. I'm asking the others too. Andrew Dalby 19:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done in Ukrainian and both Belarusian Wikipedias, I'll have a look at other Slavic Wikipedias and if you hadn't been there, I'll post in English and Russian.--Victoria (talk) 16:00, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

IRC

Hi! I just wanted to let you know that we have created an IRC channel for women and Wikipedia: called Wikimedia-gendergap - I hope you'll join us. (And if you need any IRC help, just let me know!) See you there! SarahStierch (talk) 21:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Victoria

See here. If your "vector.js" file looked like this then you could create QRpedia codes easily. Victuallers (talk) 08:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, v. interesting.--Victoria (talk) 10:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Translation

Thanks for joining and welcome aboard. Things are just slowly beginning. Do you know the quality of health care content in Russian at this point in time?--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 18:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As in any language project it varies considerably but I must say that biomedical sciences articles are quite good on average. We have several MD writing good and featured articles. I would be grateful if you let me know if there is a coordinated list of the most important medical articles to translate/improve, which I can write about to editors from small wikiprojects in Russian Federation languages.--Victoria (talk) 20:29, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]