User talk:Tiptoety

9:02 am, 15 September 2024 (PDT)

Important: This talk page is becoming very boring. Please consider leaving hilarious knock-knock jokes so as to spruce things up a little. Thanks!

Wikipedia:Don't Feed the Divas

Our environment, the world in which we live and work, is a mirror of our attitudes and expectations.

Archives
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33

Arbcom case - incorrect Arb. designation

Hi Tiptoety.

Arb Elen of the Roads recused themselves in the MF/Civility case [1] Leaky Caldron 09:11, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It has been fixed. Thank you. Tiptoety ^talk 06:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't Chase me resign from arbcom?--Guerillero | My Talk 16:56, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please see [2]. He officially steps down today. Either myself or another clerk will tend to that shortly. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 06:53, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk action requested

I would appreciate if either you, or your fellow clerk, would police incivil personal attacks on the workshop page [3]. Many thanks. Fifelfoo (talk) 00:27, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your time; your fellow clerk responded. Fifelfoo (talk) 00:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the delay on my part. Best, Tiptoety ^talk 06:56, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Request removal of reviewer userright

Hi Tiptoety - sorry to bother you, but when you have a minute would you mind removing my reviewer userright? I was just reminded of the subject from a thread on the village pump, and I thought it was probably about time that I got it removed. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 23:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 01:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 02:31, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Civility Enforcement"

Hi!

I didn't see a public explanation of why this name was chosen, and if this signifies a broadening of the scope of the inquiry. (My eyesight is poor, however.) Kiefer.Wolfowitz 01:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was chosen by the drafting Arbitrator and relayed to me on the clerks mailing list. Cheers, Tiptoety ^talk 19:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for Creation Appeal

Articles for Creation urgently needs your help!

Articles for Creation is desperately short of reviewers! We are looking for urgent help, from experienced editors, in reviewing submissions in the pending submissions queue. Currently there are 1476 submissions waiting to be reviewed.

Do you have what it takes?

Are you familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines?
Do you know what Wikipedia is and is not?
Do you have a working knowledge of the Manual of Style, particularly article naming conventions?
Are you autoconfirmed?
Can you review submissions based on their individual merits?

If the answer to these questions is yes, then please read the reviewing instructions and donate a little of your time to helping tackle the backlog.

Sent on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation using AWB on 20:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Civility Enforcement Arbitration case, Evidence and Workshopping period closed

Dear Clerk, per Risker's extension of time on Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility_enforcement there's a reasonable expectation now that the Evidence and Workshop pages will cease being edited. One of the parties to the case has [expressed concern] about these pages still being edited. thanks, Fifelfoo (talk) 04:05, 17 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Civility enforcement/Proposed decision

Cross posting to all five of the names at the top of the page (except Risker, who's talk page is locked)

Sorry to bother you, but in case you haven't seen it there's a lot of complaints here that it's now well past the Proposed Decision date and nobody has made any kind of announcement, even to say "there will be a delay, the new expected date is...". This isn't fair on anyone involved, as nobody can start work on anything until they know what the likely decision will be since nobody knows who's likely to end up blocked or under some kind of sanction. I appreciate that you don't want to rush the decision, but is there any chance someone involved in the case can post an update as to when a decision is likely to be made? At the moment, the closest thing there is to any kind of response from the Arbitration Committee is a sarcastic comment ("since when is a target a promise?").78.146.193.88 (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]