Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Rollback

Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Acalamari (talk | contribs) at 11:05, 14 March 2012 (Done two). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Rollback

(add requestview requests)


Reason for requesting rollback
I want to be able to help the wiki succeed, and I am a rollback on another wiki, so I have some experience. Hello, I'm a Wikipedian! (talk) 23:17, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) I have found one (1) undo edit in you last 500 edits and that was to your own edit. Here with this wiki or any other Wikimedia project user rights from other projects carry little weight anywhere else. I suggest using Twinkle and patrolling Recent Changes for awhile and gain some experience here and establish a track record for Admin's to judge by and then request again. Thanks for all you do. Cheers. Mlpearc (powwow) 00:10, 10 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry, but you do not really have much experience in dealing with vandalism that I can see. Try using Twinkle or the undo button to gain experience, then make another request. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:27, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting rollback Hello, I'm Walex03, a Wikipedian. I believe that acing a simple tool for reverting vandalism can help me become a well-established editor. Thank you all. 30xelawalex03 (talk) 22:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Sorry, but I can't find any contributions where you reverted vandalism. Usually the rollback permission is only given to users who have shown that they are able to recognize vandalism. Regards --Iste (D) 13:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done I'm sorry, but you do not really have much experience in dealing with vandalism that I can see. Try using Twinkle or the undo button to gain experience, then make another request. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:26, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Occasionally I come across articles in my watchlist that have been vandalized by an IP editor and it would be convenient to be able to roll back 2 or more such edits with one click. Thank you. —Diiscool (talk) 19:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) You should have more experience in reverting vandalism to get Rollback, try using Twinkle - it allows you to revert vandalism without Rollback. ~ ⇒TomTomN00 @ 19:10, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The page I'm contributing to currently - The Doon School - has seen some major vandalism recently. It is one of the first potential Good school articles from India and rollback would be extremely useful. Thanks very much. I look forward to your suggestions. :: Merlaysamuel :: (talk) 20:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Summaries like this one don't actually show a lot of vandal-fighting experience. Regards --Iste (D) 20:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
(Non-administrator comment) Decisions to grant or deny a request usually don't hinge on one edit summary. Mlpearc (powwow) 01:01, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done You seem to be here to edit in a very narrow area (The Doon School article and related pages), and you do not have much experience fighting vandalism, either on that page or elsewhere. If you want to revert edits quickly, you can use Twinkle. Best, CharlieEchoTango (contact) 01:13, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For the purposes described in WP:RBK#When to use rollback, e.g., speedy undoing obvious vandalism. —glossologist (talk) 22:20, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Requesting rollback for generic reason (vandalism) + RC. A412 (TalkC) 01:34, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - I'm sorry, but you do not really have much experience in dealing with vandalism that I can see. Try using Twinkle or the undo button to gain experience, then make another request. I do see good work at WP:AFC, but note that a lot of those edits are automated and not related to anti-vandalism. Tiptoety talk 01:40, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WOW,how do you get so many edits in a single second and how are they so similar.--WOLfan112 (talk) 19:03, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When I use the random article button I see some really good pages with a lot of potential being vandalized.Yes, we are supposed to "assume good faith". But when you see a "A" class article being totally blanked, you NEED rollback. WOLfan112 (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Not done - Far too few edits, coupled with the fact your request for rollback was denied back on the 8th of this month. Please wait at least a month before reapply for rollback. Tiptoety talk 20:29, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reason for requesting goes here

Hi, I'm a pt.wikipedia user and I usually make small edits on en.wikipedia, mainly interwikis. I would like to increase my contribution in other areas, particularly in combating vandalism. If you look my rights on toolserver, you see I am autopatroller on meta and sysop on ptwiki.

Willy Weazley 20:37, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi, Willy. You are doing an excellent job removing vandalism. But the fact is that you've only 101 edits, as of now. You may be granted this right if you have a bit more experience in Wikipedia. That said, that's just my comment. Dipankan says.. ("Be bold and edit!") 10:52, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 11:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Reverting Vandalism is the main task I perform at Wikipedia. And very frequently, I come across articles in my watchlist that have been vandalized by several IP users. It would be easier to be able to roll back 2 or more such edits with one click. Thank you -Msrag (talk) 05:08, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Acalamari 11:05, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]