User talk:68.107.141.42

This IP declares herself officially proud of being labeled a Nuisance for having the nerve to correct WP:DYK misinformation. Thank you, Cwmhiraeth. No barn star or 10 points for serving up misinformation to Wikipedia readers could have as much meaning as your label. Thank you for personally attacking me for wanting accuracy in Wikipedia.[1][2]

And, I am now proud of being labeled "Nonconstructive" by User:Imzada1979 for attempting to get some help correcting a contradictory sentence in an article "Your continued insistence on mis-tagging the article (which repeatedly doing is disruptive and borderline vandalism) got the article locked.". Don't run to the article's talk page to find this discussion, as Imzada1979 will not be discussing the article on the talk page. My parents would be so proud of me. 68.107.141.42 (talk) 12:48, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

THe revert war of one guilty party.

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 18:12, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Moving on

I told you to fix the article, and that I was moving on from any discussions. There was really nothing to discuss, and as I pointed out, you could have made the simple change to the article long ago. Your continued insistence on mis-tagging the article (which repeatedly doing is disruptive and borderline vandalism) got the article locked. Had it not been locked, you could have changed one word and things would have been updated. The article is not on my watch list, nothing I care about, and you manufactured an overreaction to cause drama. This "dispute" of yours no longer interests me at all, so please do me the courtesy of leaving me alone. Thank you. Imzadi 1979 → 12:34, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

I personally think if you want a "courtesy" you ought to show understanding of the "courtesy" you are requesting.

IE, please do me the courtesy of leaving me alone, if you really want to be left alone.

68.107.141.42 (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

File:Chocolate-Easter-Bunny.jpg

Happy Easter! Enjoy!

Although I don't necessarily agree with your views, your interventions have made me think carefully about the wording of DYK hooks, and I won't in future pipe a link to a species while using a more general term in the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:31, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

No idea what to say.

"This section of my user page is contained in a blanked out section and can only be viewed by someone probing into things that do not concern them, someone apparently operating a vendetta against me. The slime mould article was not ideal and was not easy to write because so little information was available about that species but the midwife toad article and original DYK hook were fine. Can't you find something more constructive to do in Wikipedia than attack other editors who are doing their best to add useful content?"A quote from User:Cwmhiraeth

You might try looking at your edit history some time and clicking on diffs. And you accusemoi of having the vendetta! 68.107.141.42 (talk) 03:27, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I wonder why you want to spend time "looking at my edit history and clicking on diffs"? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:16, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I wonder why you want to call it "interference" and a "nuiscance" (→‎Resources: Added nuisance) when another editor improves wikipedia by correcting an article you WP:OWN? I wonder why you want to make sure you announce this interference is by an "IP editor" in your edit summary "(→‎Resources: Comments on an IP editor.)"? 68.107.141.42 (talk) 14:33, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

---