Jump to content

Talk:1995

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 24.191.87.42 (talk) at 00:28, 16 April 2012 (→‎No "births" section?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconYears List‑class Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
ListThis article has been rated as List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bose-Einstein condensate

heres a thought for you all, june 5, 1995, first Bose Einstien condensate achieved. hey its just a thought but i think that is notable don't you?

Format

26-June-2007: The years 1900-1999 got a condensed Table of Contents after 28May07. See Talk:1950#Format (and "Talk:1950#Condensed TOC"). -Wikid77 22:53 26-June-2007

Nuclear

"Russia almost launches a nuclear" is that npov ?

what mean almost launches ? who decided ? to what extend the Russians where on alert ? Ericd

2004 page layout years

There is a discussion on my talk page on page layout.

For most of the last three hundred years there is inconsistency and duplication between the year in topic paragraph, the "see also" box and what is on the year by topic pages. Prior to 1950 I am pretty convinced we can painlessly (except for sore fingers) delete all of the year in topic paragraphs and ensure that the material goes into a "see also" box, creating such a box where none exists. Post 1950, particularly from the "year in US television" link a lot of material has been added to this paragraph as highlights (sometimes making up most of the page content pointed at).

Personally I think we should still delete the paragraph, keep the box linking to the topic sites and move any particularly important parts of the year in topic paragraph to the main chronological list. This does involve undoing quite a bit of work which someone has done.

Therefore, unlike for prior to 1950 (where I've said no objection= I do it) for post 1950 I won't touch these pages unless a significant number of people agree with the change. (I am also unlikely to get the pre 1950 stuff done before summer unless the service speed improves dramatically). talk--BozMo 13:41, 7 May 2004 (UTC)[reply]

Earthquake

I removed a reference to the Nov 22 Earthquake being possibly thought of as "Divine" anger at some EU-Israel treaty. I think if this is true then the event should have its own page and a discussion of what happened, along with external references. I'm fairly certain that this page is meant only as a summary rather than a detailed examination of the subject. One Salient Oversight 04:26, 21 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Children of notable people

There has been a bit of discussion on Talk:2005, having notable parents does not make someone's birth inherently notable. I hadn't the heart to delete Dolly the sheep though. PatGallacher 11:28, 2005 May 30 (UTC)

Gotta cite my addition

January-June Births

What on Earth happened here? Hallpriest9 (Talk | Archive) 05:09, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've fixed it. In the future please just delete any redlink additions as nn. Carl.bunderson (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The image Image:Windows95BOXSHOT.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

March 16 of wrong century?

"March 16 – Mississippi ratifies the Thirteenth Amendment, becoming the last state to approve the abolition of slavery. The amendment was nationally ratified in 1865."

Has this been posted in the wrong year? Thaumaturgus (talk) 21:00, 10 September 2009 (UTC)Thaum[reply]

june 2 typo

can someone fix the text 'ndash' at june 2nd which should be a hyphen instead?

Done... ttonyb (talk) 05:53, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 31, 2010 trim

I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 14:07, July 31, 2010 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements.

October 13, 2010 trim

I will remove some less notable or unsourced events from the list and put them here. Feelfree to discuss. I have rough criteria in mind, but typing them would be too long. Circeus 05:10, October 13, 2010 (UTC) The years are missing from the copied elements. [citation needed]

Great Hanshin earthquake on January 17

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 02:55, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No "births" section?

I don't know because I didn't go through the article; is there really no section for notable births , or are they mixed in with the events? 24.191.87.42 (talk) 00:25, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]