Talk:The Devil Went Down to Georgia
 | Songs B‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
Cleanup
I put in new headlines and reorganised the article a bit, but I dunno if I should remove the cleanup tag or not. The page needs a song info box, I think...but I wouldn't know how to put one of those up. --Gromreaper 03:56, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Infobox and such
I tossed in an infobox, but I know very little about the single, so I couldn't add much. I'd appreciate anything anyone can add in.
Also, we can't have the lyrics there like we did. The Son Of Nothing 15:49, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
If lyrics and infoboxes can't do anything, then what can? MKguy42192 (talk) 04:51, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Genre
According to wikipedia's own website this is, in fact, a country song.
See Charlie_Daniels:
"Daniels won the Grammy Award for Best Country Vocal Performance in 1979 for "The Devil Went Down to Georgia", which reached #3 on the charts."
Stephen Lynch
In Stephen Lynch's song "Beelz" (about a flamboyant version of Satan) he makes a joke stating that the devil "would never be caught dead in Georgia" (after imitating the Charlie Daniels Band briefly) This isn't really a parody, and i'm not nearly good enough at editing wikipedia to add it in a relevent section.
Spoilers?
Do we really need a spoiler warning? It's a song for crying out loud. Ungovernable ForceGot something to say? 06:31, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Devil went to Jamaica
This song was written by Travis Meyer http://www.drdemento.com/playlists/drd98.0815.html when he was at WBYR-FM.
Coyote Ugly
Should there not be some reference to the song being A) Used in the movie Coyote Ugly (film) as the main bar song, but more importantly that this is one song that every Coyote Ugly Saloon bar uses for the girls to get on the bar and do their routine? I think it's worthy of the recognition. Don't you?? Timclare (talk) (sign here) 02:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:MillionMileReflections.jpg
Image:MillionMileReflections.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:12, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Covers/Adaptations/Parodies Sections
Since I was reverted, I'll go here. Please cite those sections, and show how they are important to this article. Otherwise, they will be removed per WP:V and WP:TRIVIA. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I more or less second this, except I wouldn't be too hasty flat out removing them. Obliterating them will only serve to offend and aggravate the regular editors and I don't want to see edit warring here. As it stands, the tags should stay, if no improvement or attempt to trim, prune, integrate, or improve said sections is seen, then we should consider deleting the most trivial parts flat out. Wisdom89 (T / C) 01:13, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I concur with the sentiment expressed above. There is some good information in these sections that I would hate to see removed and should remain in the article in some form, but in its present form it has too much. It needs to be pared down, and some of the less important or more tenuous entries removed, and these three sections combined into one or two. At a minimum, the Covers and the Adaptations sections look like they could be combined. --Mwalimu59 (talk) 06:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Very little of the content in the sections I listed is relevent. In addition, it is not cited. seresin | wasn't he just...? 01:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
I've added the examplefarm template to the header as I believe it more concisely addresses the problem of having too many adaptations/covers/parodies than the trivia tags did. I've also removed the comments about Guitar Hero since they seem overly pedantic. We can add some of those back later if that particular problem rears its head again. --Mwalimu59 (talk) 17:20, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Has there been any significant progress on this discussion since February? This article is a mess. There isn't even consistency among the headings (the covers are all mixed with cultural uses). I'm going to be a bit WP:BOLD and clean it up. Movingboxes (talk) 11:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Okay, please take a look and let me know what you think. People might have questions about removing the Tenacious D stuff. My reasoning was that the devil vs. human motif isn't all that uncommon and I don't feel that "Tribute" is directly inspired by the song (and Tenacious D haven't, to my knowledge, said that it is. I also trimmed the level of detail on some things, reasoning we don't need to know how the various battles worked out on, say, Futurama or Robot Chicken. Again, I'm not trying to come take over the article, but just get things going towards improvement with the end goal of a better article. Movingboxes (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Cover, additional information needed
I've heard a song on the radio called "Manuel Went Down to Georgia," a parody cover likening the devil to illegal immigration, and I think it deserves a mention here. However, I wasn't able to find any additional information, such as who made it, so I don't know if it can go in. Dukeofwulf (talk) 17:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)
Charlie Daniels has issues.
Anybody else read that article where he didn't approve the Guitar Hero remake? You see his main reasoning? It's retarded.
"The song, "The Devil Went Down To Georgia," which I wrote, is supposed to be a lighthearted novelty about a fiddling contest between a country boy and the devil and the devil always loses.
That is not the case with the Guitar Hero version which comes complete with a horned, guitar-playing devil who battles the player and very often wins."
Uh... if you lose... that's probably because you suck at Guitar Hero. That's not the point, Charlie. The point of the battle is to beat the devil. And when you do, you get the victory solo with the lines saying that the devil got beat.
He needs to chill out. Besides, you can download the full song off of Live, and, if he had seen that, first, he probably wouldn't have had a problem with it, unless he hates metal.
I know it's probably disheartening that he has no say in remakes, now, but still, he also might be a bit jealous that the Steve Ouimette remake kicks more ass than his.
j/k The Satellite (talk) 22:06, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
"Other versions and parodies" again
It's growing and taking on a life of its own again...now as long as the whole rest of the article. Do we really need to include every non-notable song by non-notable musician who has made reference of this original? I propose as a minimum guideline for inclusion that there must be notability, as demonstrated by bluelink, for the artist. If a band isn't verfiably notable at all, it's not notable for its use of TDWDtG either. Thoughts? DMacks (talk) 20:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. Even though I'm a trivia geek I think that the "References in Pop Culture" sections of many wikipedia articles are overblown and perhaps unnecessary. Do we really need to know that Peter Griffin whistled half a bar of a particular song in an episode of family guy, or that you can hear it playing in the background of a particular movie scene for three seconds? Someone commented in the discussion section of another artice that South Park had parodied everything...it doesn't really add anything to say that such and such was mentioned on south park. And you could add The Simpsons and Family Guy and Robot Chicken. I love animation, but it does seem to induce a geeky obsession with minutiae.PurpleChez (talk) 12:47, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
There is a version of the song called "The Devil Came Up to Michigan" by KMC crew which might be a parody or an homage, or just a version. Not sure how to work it into the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.119.128.3 (talk) 23:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
The sims
In the sims 2 if you die you challenge the devil to a fiddle contest, dunno if it should be mentioned or not
Primus Cover
If we're going to note covers, shouldnt Primus be acknowledged? Their version complete with elaborate stop motion animated video is probably the best known cover of the song. Im curious why it isnt mentioned anywhere in this article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.151.150.18 (talk) 23:12, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Dead external links to Allmusic website – January 2011
Since Allmusic have changed the syntax of their URLs, 1 link(s) used in the article do not work anymore and can't be migrated automatically. Please use the search option on http://www.allmusic.com to find the new location of the linked Allmusic article(s) and fix the link(s) accordingly, prefereably by using the {{Allmusic}} template. If a new location cannot be found, the link(s) should be removed. This applies to the following external links:
--CactusBot (talk) 09:48, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Theology
Given that pride is a mortal sin, I'm pretty sure that Johnny's soul was forfeit as soon as he agreed to the contest. The Devil was just playing a cruel trick on him by letting him think he won. Johnny Pez (talk) 12:40, 8 June 2012 (UTC)