Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanjay Govil

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Thorncrag (talk | contribs) at 15:45, 18 June 2012 (→‎Sanjay Govil: not a valid rationale). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Sanjay Govil (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't agree that a "lesser" (term used very loosely) award received 10 years ago evidences this person's continual notability. That seems to be the singular assertion of notability. However I am interested in what other folks have to say.  Thorncrag  15:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops - Heh, I moved it back to the AfC space before the AfD was filed (I think we were working on it at the same time...). It was clearly copy-pasted from there. Please ping me if you'd like me to undo my actions. ~ Matthewrbowker Talk to me 21:05, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that the reason for being notable for an award received 10 years ago. I think the notability factor lies in how fast he grew the business in the small time frame. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alli440 (talkcontribs) 04:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC) This template must be substituted.[reply]

That doesn't meet WP:BIO, though. And since the aforementioned award was ostensibly for the same reason, that's why I raised the issue. Still interested in seeing what other folks think.  Thorncrag  15:45, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius (have a chat) 04:03, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]