Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zaida Parveen

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by यमिनी रगा (talk | contribs) at 19:34, 21 June 2012. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Zaida Parveen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Indian Hindi TV actress who doesn't pass WP:ENTERTAINER and WP:GNG. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 12:42, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Significant? §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, in Jyoti she is the mother of the main character, in Punar Vivah the same, in Yahan Main Ghar Ghar Kheli she is the main "antagonist". Cavarrone (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! I don't find that significant. TV soap's lead actor's mom's roles!! Will let others comment on that. But this does fail GNG. All the references provided currently are from a fan-chat forum. Which are completely unacceptable. But i don't wanna waste my energy telling that for Hindi TV show related articles. It goes in vein. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 17:20, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yawn....WP:ENTERTAINER does not require you are the protagonist of a production, it requires you have SIGNIFICANT ROLES: being in the main cast of a tv-series means that your role is significant... otherwise you would be just a guest-star of the series for an episode or two... why do we lose time in discussing what is obvious? if you want to say she does not pass GNG you are free to do it, but saying she does not have significant roles in her career is just wasted time. Cavarrone (talk) 18:04, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Right to speech! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Aa..Aa!! Not lead, lead's mom. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 14:17, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The references provided are from a ⇒Newsgroup⇐, and the pages that have been referenced are not created by fans, and neither are they chat threads - just keep that in mind. ∗∗Pearz25 (talk) 17:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
... and if you are considering this page for deletion because it has no references, I know other sites that beside India-Forums that can be used. ∗∗Pearz25 (talk) 18:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
QUOTE
"India-Forums.com is the # 1 Discussion Forums with more than 350,000 members currently (Nov, 2008) and was started in December 2003."
UNQUOTE
This is what the first line in About Us section of bold-inward-arrows-newsgroup reads. And you knowing other references doesnt help Wikipedia. If you know, add them. And read WP:Reliable Source before that. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

so this article is being deleted because it has no references? Rani P23 (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No! Because the subject is not notable. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 18:17, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]