User talk:Noq

Shinnam

Sorry, I made a question earlier before I took my time to go through what you had written. Is it ok of me to remove the template at any time after a reference has been added?

Understading about Oil 4 Wales

Hi Noq I just came to say the reason why im undeleting this Oil 4 Wales site because other users keep on Undeleting my progress and keep on threating me to be Blocked but im not a strong editor and try my best to edit and I spend a lot of effort editing articles and the other Useur that had been Blocked by User:Tide rolls; but that Oil 4 Wales link was acually true Information please take a good look at this website.

Here's the Link: http://www.oiltanksupplies.co.uk/oil-tank-supplies-delivers-oil-4-wales-depot-storage-facilities/

Yours Faithfully

Juwel Aquarium

} Hi i've got loads of messages on the article I have been creating. I have referenced all the images and info and apparently I have cited it. Also it was tagged for advertisement but it isn't, its just a description of what they offer you could say that the play station page is an advertisement. Please can you explain why these things have come up. FishingKiing - Waging War On Wiki Vandals (talk) 12:50, 23 June 2012 (UTC) }

Secure Digital

To elaborate my Change Summary: In a section that discusses the many file systems you can put on an SD card, the article recommends FAT16 for standard-capacity SD cards. (The reason is that this is what consumer devices expect; other unanticipated consequences are mentioned in "Risks of reformatting".) Marchash tagged the text with {{Cn}}. I asked him on User talk:Marchash if he really thought the assertion needed a citation. He seems to have agreed with me; he withdrew his own {{Cn}} and added "to maximize compatibility." You reverted him, reasserting the {{Cn}} but also deleting his clarification. I have now inserted a more detailed clarification, but claim it still doesn't need a citation. If this isn't satisfactory, would you please move this history to Talk:Secure Digital and append your thinking to it? Spike-from-NH (talk)

Cherry Hinton C of E Primary School

Hi, I have added information on why the above article is important in the talk page. Please review the contents and remove deletion tag. If you think more needs to added for making the article notable, please provide suggestions. As the article is about a major govt run school in Cambridge, it should not be difficult to find notable sources. Lakshmi2510 (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

This article was created by a new Wikipedia editor. We really need to try and encourage new editors as best as possible rather than scaring them away as per Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers. Consequently I removed the PROD tag that you added to this article to allow time for a civilised discussion to take place with the newcomer on the talk page. I suspect that the ultimate outcome of that discussion would simply have been to merge and redirect the article to the Cherry Hinton page. Taking this article to AfD was somewhat unnecessary as this simply involves extra administrator time and the outcome would have been the same. Could I suggest that in future you adopt a more gentle approach with new Wikipedia editors? We all have to start somewhere. Dahliarose (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

new changes to embryonic stem cells

Dear Noq, If I deleted the last sentence of the first paragraph of embryonic stem cells and its reference, and typed the following would you undo my change?

Those issues include whether or not a human life at the embryonic stage should be granted the moral status of a human being as it is with a child or an adult.<ref>Baldwing A (2009). "Morality and human embryo research. Introduction to the Talking Point on morality and human embryo research". EMBO. 10 (4): 299–300. PMID 19337297. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)

Thank you, ThCPS

Adding the reference rather than replacing the existing one would probably be OK. Maybe linking to granted the moral status of a human being would be an improvement. noq (talk) 19:09, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Next What's In

Hi Noq! I am still waiting for your inputs as that will guide me to complete the article. As of now the article is incorrect and not verifiable.--Santasharma (talk) 07:22, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Mighty Quinn

Shame you deleted this... Were you at the final yesterday? Mighty Quinn is the anthem for Harlequins and has been since the 90s — Preceding unsigned comment added by Haserch (talk • contribs) 14:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes I was there - only just due to the M1 being shut, but we made it. I removed it from the article because it just does not belong as a "see also". If it were to appear anywhere it would need to be in a section discussing the link between quins and the song and I don't think it is notable enough for that. Congratulations on the win by the way. noq (talk) 14:34, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Murda Weapon

Hello Noq. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Murda Weapon, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 does not apply if the artist has an article. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 18:13, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

McColl Frontenac Oil Company

I removed the speedy tag - it asserts notability. I added two tags. Give it 24 hours, and then "prod" it. Bearian (talk) 22:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Nav-x for Distribution

I hope I'm posting this correctly. Apologies in advance if wrong.

In addition to my topic being flagged as possible spam, it also mentioned my user name. I just put in a request to change it to Mrpleasant7. I just wanted you to be aware that I'm trying to comply with the wikipedia system as best as I can understand it. Will you or somebody else be looking at my reasons for it not being considered spam and if there needs to be further interaction on the topic, do I post it here or someplace else?

Dynamicsnavx (talk) 14:26, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

An administrator will review it. They may leave a message on your talk page or if the page is deleted, you will see which admin did it and you can contact them on their talk page to discuss it further. noq (talk) 14:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Montreal Wanderers RFC

Hi Noq... I edited the Montreal Wanderers RFC page, adding additional content and providing references. Please review and consider removing the speedy notification tag. Chrispam.montreal (talk) 15:27, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Noq... I did a bit more digging and came across this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Rugby_union#Notability_of_Club_Sides I believe that the Montreal Wanderers RFC page meets the criteria due to "notable players". Also, the wanderers meeting the criteria for notability by being the "founding member of a federation or union". Please review and consider removing the speedy notification tag. Chrispam.montreal (talk) 15:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)