Social Planning Toronto
Hi Noq... I see you've flagged this new page for speedy deletion. I'm hoping to work through this with you... specifically what could be done to satisfy your requirements. Appreciate your efforts to keep Wikipedia a credible entity!
Hi Noq, the user L4355341 is repeatedly trying to make his monopoly. You can see his history. He should be blocked for creating nuisance in Wikipaedia. Thanks!!!
Speedy deletion nomination of Pontiac Continuing Education Centre
Hello Noq. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that you shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1), content (CSD A3),or significance (CSD A7) moments after they are created, as you did at Pontiac Continuing Education Centre. It's best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks..
Wikiproject Udaipur- support needed
Hi Noq, Thanks for your efforts for improving the Udaipur article. Taking it one step further, we have initiated a dedicated Wikipedia project for this beautiful city of lakes. To get started with this, we need your support in terms of approval for this project. We are required to provide approval/support in an ongoing discussion at the below link: Wikipedia_talk:Noticeboard_for_India-related_topics#Requesting_dedicated_project_for_Udaipur_.28WikiProject_Udaipur.29
Inappropriate edit reversions
You recently undid a commit of mine, adding an entry to the list of websocket implementations on the unfounded assertion that the entry I added is not notable. Beast is as notable as several other entries in the list, used in at least one large open-source and in the Boost incubator - which means it may soon end up in Boost.
- @User:Nbougalis, Please WP:assume good faith. As the software has not been shown to be notable, removing it was perfectly justifiable. Per WP:BRD instead of reverting my reversion, the correct procedure would be to discuss it on the articles talk page. noq (talk) 16:57, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
A cup of coffee for you!
|There's some awesome works you have done. And now I award you with the Cup of Coffee. Great job! Amy2563 (talk) 08:05, 7 June 2016 (UTC)|
- @User:AesopMuse, I'm sure it would be possible to make a tenuous link to economics on many many subjects - that does not make them appropriate see also entries for nearly everything. noq (talk) 09:18, 13 June 2016 (UTC)