Jump to content

Talk:5-simplex honeycomb

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rmky87 (talk | contribs) at 17:59, 4 July 2012 (stub --> start). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Low‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

population

Each vertex is shared by 12 5-simplexes, 30 rectified 5-simplexes, and 20 birectified 5-simplexes.

So I'm guessing that the population of these cells in the tiling is in the ratio 2:2:1, respectively (i.e. 12/6 : 30/15 : 20/20). Right? Is that worth including? —Tamfang (talk) 21:04, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These facets are easy to extract from the vertex figure, but I've not thought into how to compute ratios in the full tessellation. It would be good to have a summary from the whole family, under blank link simplectic honeycomb! I see the facet ratios in the 5-cell_honeycomb are given as 3:1, and Tetrahedral-octahedral_honeycomb is 2:1. There's also 6-simplex_honeycomb after this one.
Ah, Klitzing lists the tetracombs at [1], and [2], shows 1:1 ratio, so 5-cell_honeycomb is given wrong as 3:1. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:05, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see, looks like ratio is 1:1:1:1:1, with first/last are 5-simplex, second/penultimate are rect-5-simp, and middle is birect-5-simplex, so 2:2:1 is correct. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:11, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Added. Tom Ruen (talk) 02:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]