Jump to content

Talk:400 kV Thames Crossing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aquizard (talk | contribs) at 14:09, 15 July 2012 (→‎Article title). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

WikiProject iconEnergy Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconRiver Thames Start‑class (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject River Thames, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Photo

I will try and get a photo this weekend if I get time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Htmlland (talkcontribs) 18:37 2 October, 2007 (UTC)

This article would definitely benefit from a photo. In the absence of one from Htmlland since his comment last year, are they any volunteers? Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

So which is it? The title says 380 kV. The article text talks about 400 kV. Astronaut (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed all mentions of "400 kV" to read "380 kV" instead. I really don't know which is correct. See WP:BRD. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? 85.217.38.115 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Having worked in the Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC) for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section the correct voltage is 400kV. We do not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard 15:05, 15 July 2012 (UTC) Aquizard 14:09, 15 July 2012 (UTC)