Talk:400 kV Thames Crossing
![]() | Energy Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | River Thames Start‑class (inactive) | ||||||
|
Photo
I will try and get a photo this weekend if I get time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Htmlland (talk • contribs) 18:37 2 October, 2007 (UTC)
- This article would definitely benefit from a photo. In the absence of one from Htmlland since his comment last year, are they any volunteers? Rovaniemi-5 (talk) 03:43, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
Article title
So which is it? The title says 380 kV. The article text talks about 400 kV. Astronaut (talk) 04:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
- I changed all mentions of "400 kV" to read "380 kV" instead. I really don't know which is correct. See WP:BRD. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
And how can there be a platform in 670 feet if the towers are 623 feet tall? 85.217.38.115 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- I deleted any mention of the height and just said he fell. TWCarlson (talk) 14:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Having worked in the UK Electricity Supply Industry (CEGB/NGC) for number of years within the London Area, and undertaken computer studies on that section of the network, the correct voltage is 400kV. NGC, the operators of the transmission system in the UK does not have anything that operates at 380kV. So I am editing the text to correct this and someone needs to edit the title. Aquizard (talk) 17:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)