User talk:TheIrishWarden

          Nice Wikipedians only!

WARNING: If you have come to deliberately attack, harass or offend me LEAVE NOW. If you dare leave offensive messages you will receive an ONLY warning for personal attacks.

Archives

Archive1 - July 2012 – August 2012,

Archived

Please note that talk on this age before 18th July 2012 has now been archived and can be found in Archive 1. Please only leave messages on this page though. Thanks TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 10:20, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info about me

TheIrishWarden · (talk · contribs · deleted · cross-wiki · wikichecker · count · pages created · auto edits · logs · block log · rights log · google) · lu · rfar · rfc · rfcu · ssp · spi) (assign permissions) (^{r · p · f · c})

This help request has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please replace the code {{Help me-helped}} on this page with {{Help me}}, post a new help me template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.

What is an RFCU in Wiki terms? TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 08:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RFCU, also called SPI case: If somebody had filled a case about you about socking (so using multiple accounts for disruptive actions). mabdul 11:04, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't about me socking, just about another user who may have been using IP's to harass me recently. Thanks Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud (talk) 11:05, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's the reason why your RFCU link above is a redlink... mabdul 11:10, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Gareth Griffith-Jones

Hello, TheIrishWarden. You have new messages at Gareth Griffith-Jones's talk page.
Message added 10:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 10:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On worth of editors

An editor here does not need a certificate of worth from other editors. If you are making good edits here people will certainly appreciate your work whenever they notice it. If some editor is causing disruption on articles or to other users, he will be notified/warned by editors, after which you can get advise/sugestion from admins or editors you trust. Try various things but do what you enjoy doing here as you are not getting paid here. I am very active in fighting vandalism, and its good to contribte in that area as long as you stick on reverting only obvious vandalsim. following WP:NOTVANDAL might be helpful. regards--DBig Xray 12:39, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for that advice. Also do you think CUTKD is the controller of those IP's as EggCentric has issued a SPI against CUTKD and is making out that he is attacking my pages. I did make comment but removed it, just want to see what the verdict is. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud (talk) 12:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before I made my last comment here informing you about the geolocate feature, I tried to look at the geolocation of the IPs they seem to be from different locations. the person may be using proxies for editing. in any case only a check user can determine who the controller is, and even if they find out who the culprit is, the check users are not allowed to publicly link IPs to usernames. So just drop it, and dont think on those edits or the persons involved, it will not give you any pleasure and will lead to more WP:DRAMA. cheers--DBig Xray 12:52, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I with drawled my comment from it, EggCentric set it up and it still pursuing it. I'll just be interesting for me the results of it. Thєíríshwαrdєn - írísh αnd prσud (talk) 12:57, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I saw that, lets hope truth will be uncovered, and the perpetrator gets the right message. --DBig Xray 13:34, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Robotoki.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 13:54, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

SPIs

I've just logged in to see that EC has gone ballistic and filed all sorts of SPIs against me. Look, I can't deny there's some truth to what he's mentioned - I do know of him irl, but most of it is a pile of toss (and I do suspect the guy has a few mental issues - for one reason or another). It's a real shame you (and anyone else for that matter) has been subjected to his warped version of events. You say the evidence stacks up, but how hard is it to frame someone here on wiki, be it Gareth or myself? How hard is it to invent evidence. All I ask is that you let the SPIs run their course, then make your mind up. In the meantime, I'm out of here. C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 20:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]