Jump to content

Talk:Batman: Under the Red Hood

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by AnthonyTheGamer (talk | contribs) at 16:29, 23 July 2012 (SECTION FOR EXPLANATION: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Untitled

This movie was recently leaked on 4chan, would that be a noteworthy addition to the article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.139.77.79 (talk) 00:50, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but not specifically 4chan (I personally saw it hosted on a separate site). With a verifiable source we should add its early-release to the article. 67.83.27.189 (talk) 04:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, please...! Think about it for a second: What's so special, notable and incredible interesting about a movie available on the internet (even before it's official release)? This happens all the time, if you mention it in one article, you have to mention this "incredible interesting" fact on every other article too. - And always keep in mind, this is NOT a fan-site, but an encyclopedia! --93.135.118.3 (talk) 22:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, an encyclopedia about the movie, and this is information about the movie. It was leaked on-line prior to its release, and with a verifiable source that is notable information about the film, and should be put in the article. Such information is what is supposed to be on here: verifiable information about the production of a film and its release. It's got nothing to do with fan-site. 67.83.27.189 (talk) 02:40, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You think you would find this kind of trivial nonsense in a serious lexicon? No way! No film-lexicon in the world would print an artilce about a movie with stuff like "...this movie was leaked on website xyz before its release". If you find just one article in a serious lexicon about a movie mentioning stuff like that, you are welcome to add it... otherwise it just don't belongs here. Q.E.D. ;-) 93.133.211.48 (talk) 23:06, 28 August 2010 (UTC) .[reply]


Amazo's MARVELlous powers

This obvious Marvel/DC crossover needs addressing somewhere in the article.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendroche (talkcontribs) 05:18, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong, wrong, wrong, WRONG. Amazo got his/their powers from the original JLA. Deleting your "addition". Checkmate11B (talk) 06:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even bother to read the Amazo wikipedia article? All is explained there.-5- (talk) 06:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superman may account for the red lasers from the eyes and, at a stretch, Firestorm could account for the ability to fly while on fire but, please, fill me in on which DC character does an overhead, double-handed smash into the ground causing it to ripple into his enemies?Where is WikiOpinions? (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Superman accounts for the flight, or it could be MM (edit: Martian Manhunter), the fire has NOTHING to do with it. The "overhead" smash, is just super strength, a la Superman.Checkmate11B (talk) 06:35, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why, then, is the overhand smash in eactly the same manner and style of The Hulk, to the point where you can all but hear him shout "Hulk Smash".Where is WikiOpinions? (talk) 06:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it is similar(and it certainly is) doesn't mean there was a "cross over". It may appear to you that only the Hulk can do that, but Superman does the SAME move a lot in tons of comics he's featured in. The similarity is just a coincidence, nothing more. If he shouted "Hulk smash" you may have had something. He doesn't. Regardless, the Amazo back story has NO cross over. So, therefore, you're wrong and this conversation needs to end. Checkmate11B (talk) 06:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spoilers in Opening Paragraph

Shouldn't someone remove the spoilers in the opening paragraph? Netflix, IMDB, and the movie's official webpage all credit Jensen Ackles as the Red Hood without mentioning the Hood's real name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.15.3 (talk) 04:54, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Spoiler.-5- (talk) 08:43, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fearsome Hand of Four

As far as I can tell, they were made up for this. The subtitles call the big guy "Bulk", the staff-wielding one "Baton", and the one with the laser in his head "Shot". If the woman is ever named, I didn't catch it. I didn't see any of them listed in the credits, yet two of them are given on here as "Large assassin (uncredited)" and "Female assassin (uncredited)". I think the actual names (including the fourth one, if available) should be incorporated into the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.62.113.164 (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The comic

DC just put out a comic called "Batman: Under the Red Hood" that collects Batman #635-641, 645-650 and Batman Annual #25. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.31.124.126 (talk) 15:07, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SECTION FOR EXPLANATION

Why did they increase Batman's strength, agility and strength? Explanation of Jason Todd's killing spree. AnthonyTheGamer (talk) 16:29, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]