User talk:Vago

EOL

Hi, do you understand what is going on with EOL and Geum? Are you perhaps a knowledgeable editor of EOL? Is it prone to glitches? The link that you now have there looks fine, and doesn't include an entry for Geum avens, but the previous one that you had there was for Geum avens itself, and had images from the wrong genus. I'm interested because at one time I considered editing EOL, but it seemed more productive to spend my time on wikipedia. Nadiatalent (talk) 13:23, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks, that fixed the previous link. I adding links to EOL, GRIN, IPNI and etc. on the AzWiki and RuWiki to the templates. At the same time to incorporate them into EnViki. Best regards Vago (talk) 13:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

li:User:Vagobot

Could you get a bot flag please? For more information, read the first lines concerning bots here. --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 08:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done.Vago (talk) 12:15, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bot status on dv.wikipedia

Hi,

You are making bot edits on dv.wikipedia. Can you please get a blot flag there? Thank you. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 19:56, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article.

Could other users check User:MarshallBagramyan expropriation of the entire Kars article. This user constantly erases the other versions of the name of the city Kars in other languages (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars, Azerbaijani: Qars, Georgian: ყარსი Kars, Kurdish: Qers, Russian: Карс Kars) , and only lets the Armenian version of the name to stay (Armenian: Կարս Kars or Ղարս [ʁɑɾs] Ghars). Unfortunately this user's ethnocentric POV pushing by ignoring the history of the city, after the Armenian era, is still allowed to stay. He even defends it in the city article talk page. Could you follow the Kars article and prevent the constant nationalist POV reversals and editions of User:MarshallBagramyan. Thank you.

Your bot @zea.wiki

Could you please make a request for a bot flag here? Thank you :) --OosWesThoesBes (talk) 10:06, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! :) Best regards, Vago (talk) 10:12, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could all Azeri users check User:Yerevanci's and User:Nocturnal781's relentless POV additions, lately in the Ermenikend article.

These users constantly change the correct article name of Ermenikend into the incorrect name of "Armenikend". Could all Azeri users prevent the taking over of articles about Azerbaijan by Armenian users with their biased nationalistic POV agenda. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.158.240 (talk) 12:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

English bot bad edit case

Could you please have your bot watch out for blanked pages, and not add stuff to the blanked pages. Here is the specific edit that caught my eye. The bot's edit is worthless on the empty vandalized page, and makes it more difficult to undo the blanking vandalism. - TexasAndroid (talk) 13:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC) this[reply]

The bot automatically inserts interwiki. Therefore it is necessary from an article in the Japanese Wikipedia remove the interwiki. Then the robot will not added interwiki again. Best regards, Vago (talk) 13:52, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]