Talk:Foil (fencing)

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Fencing Start‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fencing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to fencing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FencingWikipedia:WikiProject FencingTemplate:WikiProject FencingFencing articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

A summary of this article appears in Fencing.

FIE legality of non-maraging blades

In the section describing blade material, it is stated that maraging steel is the only material legal for international competition when, in fact, any material is legal as long as it conforms to the requirements for shape, weight, flexibility, conductivity, length, and the SEMI committee's durability test. There have been experimental composite blades that were legal, but never produced because fencers preferred the balance of the steel blade instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.151.210 (talk) 20:27, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The following doesn't quite meet NPOV, and is a little inaccurate:

"There are three main types of foil, the most common being the French style, with a grip (handle or hilt) designed to facilitate greater finesse. Other types include the Italian style, which is designed more for control and power, and the orthopedic, or pistol-grip, which takes the need for a firm hold on the weapon even further. Critics of the pistol-grip, however, claim this leads to a "deathgrip" on the foil and inhibits true mastery."

So I changed it to this:

"There are three main types of foil, including the French style, with a grip (handle or hilt) designed to facilitate greater finesse. Other types include the Italian style, whose grip is designed more for control and power, and the orthopedic, or pistol grip, which takes the need for a firm hold on the weapon even further. The French style is commonly found among classical fencing masters, while sport fencers often prefer the pistol grip. Critics of the pistol grip, however, claim this leads to a "deathgrip" on the foil and inhibits true mastery."

But those are the main ones, the main grips are only French and variations of the Pistol grip. Italian is uncommon, sure it is still used, but not as much as the main two. Yeah I kind of agree to the "deathgrip" because I've noticed that my hand sorta grabs onto the pistol a bit too hard sometimes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.247.113.98 (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What exactly is a deathgrip? I've always used pistols, with the exception of dry weapons, and haven't noticed any ailments. Aside from that, I think that article is much better now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.226.216 (talk) 21:45, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A deathgrip is simply gripping the weapon too hard.

I went and corected the grip section to indicate that the Italian, while legal, ir rarely used. In addition, I corected the part about the foil circuit....the light does NOT fire on completion of the circuit....that's epee. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.88.17 (talk) 04:07, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, for the record, is it even worth mentioning the certain variations of the Italian grip? They resemble pistols except they have a small ring for the forefinger. I've never seen one in the states, so whether they're legal in competition is beyond me, although my brother fenced with one in the UK once. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickiswalter (talk • contribs) 19:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is the NPOV warning still needed for this section? The wording has moved on, and seems to have dealt with the issue which was raised. Random name (talk) 11:01, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree weith Random Name, the issue (whatever it was) appears to have been resolved; the editor who placed the tag didn't leave a comment as to what (s)he thought was NPOV. So I decided to be bold and removed it. Nibios (talk) 21:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

I know the Italian grip is in the picture right now for historical reasons, but I think that it should really be an modern electric French or pistol grip. At the very least one should be present for comparison. Isopropyl 05:17, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do about getting a picture of a foil.--digital_m e^{(TalkˑContribs)} 16:47, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why the Italian grip is even mentioned in the article - as far as I know it is not used at all in modern fencing. In my experience, the overwhelming majority of sport fencing is with a pistol grip, and very few people use French. It tends to cause a more violent style of fencing due to much less control over the foil. --Katrielalex 23:17, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you know how to use it, the French grip gives an extreme amount of control over the foil, but most people do not know how to use it, and it also doesn't allow for flicking, which may or may not be re-introduced. In any case, the Italian grip is extremely rare in all weapons.--digital_m e^{(Talk•Contribs)} 03:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may be rare, but the Italian is used by some in sport fencing. You could never get me to trade my Italian grip for a French or Pistol. It's saved me from being disarmed on at least two occasions where I only had my fingers in a ring but was able to recover before my opponent pressed the advantage.TerminalSaint 07:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC

But since a disarm stops the action, it is not terribly critical to keep from being disarmed.

Agreed. French grip, with accomplished fencer, is less violent in my experience.--Epeefleche 03:12, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough - I have no experience of international-level fencing so I'm just talking about what I know. In any case, Italian should go, right? --Katrielalex 07:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say that the violent people gravitate more towards the pistols than the pistols causing violence. It does make for a much more powerful beat, and it is also easier on the two main fingers when going against a larger opponent. Anyway, it is important enough to be worth a mention

Do we still want a picture of a french or orthopedic grip? I can provide either - shall I just replace the italian one? (To be fair, I was quite interested in the picture of the italian grip - I've never seen one before.) Random name (talk) 09:14, 5 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's 2012 and the picture of the Italian grip foil is still there. No competitive foil fencer uses this grip, it's like having a picture of a penny-farthing replica in an article on bicycle racing. Can someone please upload a picture of a normal, ie visconti or belgian pistol grip foil? I'm not a foil fencer or I'd do it myself, but this is ridiculous. Baron ridiculous (talk) 02:27, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Todays Top Foil Fencers" section

Seems like just a bunch of badly formatted and mispelled assertions. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.68.157.4 (talk) 23:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Would someone with adequate knowledge of the sport (i.e. not myself) mind checking the last paragraph under "Foil Today" for accuracy and NPOV? 68.95.231.34 22:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grips

I know a person who was carrying 30-ish pistol grip foils for his fencing team and when he entered the airport, the police said "what do you have in there?" and he said, "30 pistol grips"... I think you know what happened next.

Possibly apocryphal story: the airport security people were looking under the bell guard and fooling with the wires there, and the fencer said "don't mess around with the wires or it won't go off". I think you can guess what happened there, too! Jsavit (talk) 18:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fleuret

I wiki'd Fleuret and got redirected to foil, but there is no reference to fleuret here, so I am none the wiser. —Preceding unsigned comment added by IceDragon64 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fleuret is French for "foil" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.216.1.16 (talk) 06:57, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Competition scoring

Was watching the Olympics today, and the scoring seems to have changed since I was last near a sword (okay I never reached Olympic standard but I did fence for my college) it used to be first to 5 points with no time limits, can someone add something about scoring. Thanks. KTo288 (talk) 10:14, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, there were time limits when you were in college, but they may have been ignored (contrary to the rules) in matches you fenced in. Years ago: 5 minutes fencing time in a 5-touch bout, now it's 3 minutes. The scoring is different in several ways from the rules decades ago: touches are now scored for the fencer making the touch rather than as "touches against" (expressed differently: if you score a touch you now have 1 added to your score, and the first fencer to reach 5 touches wins. Previously 1 was added to your score if you were hit, and the first person to be hit 5 times lost). Same thing effectively, but perhaps more easily understood. The other big change from decades ago is that most matches only have 5-touch individual bouts in a single round of "pools" (groups of 5 to 7 fencers each fencing one another round-robin style). The results of this round are used purely for seeding purposes for direct elimination ("DE") rounds, which are based on 15-touch bouts, with 3 periods of 3 minutes fencing team each, separated by 1 minute rest periods. As in the 5-touch bouts used in pools, the bout ends either when a fencer reaches the 15 or 5 touches for that bout format, or time runs out. None of this is specific to foil fencing, so should not be added to this article. Jsavit (talk) 18:36, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image needs replacement

Hello all...

An image used in the article, specifically Image:Anatomyoffoil.jpg, has a little bit of a licensing issue. The image was uploaded back when the rules around image uploading were less restrictive. It is presumed that the uploader was willing to license the picture under the GFDL license but was not clear in that regard. As such, the image, while not at risk of deletion, is likely not clearly licensed to allow for free use in any future use of this article. If anyone has an image that can replace this, or can go take one and upload it, it would be best.

You have your mission, take your camera and start clicking.--Jordan 1972 (talk) 21:59, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All Caps Surnames

In the list of names at the bottom of the article, there are many surnames that are expressed entirely in capital letters. Is this standard in the sport / where does that come from. I know no reason for it, so I don't know why it should be the way it is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.219.226.57 (talk) 17:17, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Foil as a thrusting weapon reference

I removed this reference...the rule does NOT mean that you can only score by "stabbing," it means that points can only be scored with the point, compared to sabre where any part of the blade can score.

Don't just read the rules....UNDERSTAND them. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.119.37.180 (talk) 16:46, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

American fencers list

Country fencers lists IMO should not be linked to this page with 150 countries in FIE it is improbable to maintain. No troll (talk) 03:06, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

But how many of them have lists? I'm willing to bet it's a lot less than 150. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 03:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All countries maintain lists of their fencers. Maintaining special lists leads to the opionionated articles that lose their neutrality. There is no logical link between rules of foil fencing an d alist of male foil fencers from USA.No troll (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

American Fencing League

Mentioning of American Fencing League in this article is clearly a promotion of small non for profit organization that is not needed to be mentioned as rules of foil fencing are explained. No troll (talk) 03:15, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Conventional Weapons

There are numerous descriptions of right of way between the different fencing related pages. I feel a separate page detailing 'Conventional weapons' (or something) should be created that can give a laymans description of right of way, rather than having separate descriptions on the Fencing page, Sabre page, foil page, and tactics page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jslimmer (talk • contribs) 12:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no "conventional weapon" right of way - there are priority rules for foil, and there are priority rules for sabre. These priority rules have a lot in common, but a few differences. It is very difficult to write a basic, accurate, description of priority rules, because they are quite complex and involve specialized terminology - as is shown by the attempts at writing simple descriptions of priority rules. 130.216.60.4 (talk) 00:14, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Steam foil"?

I assume this is a somewhat tongue-in-cheek term for a non-electric foil. Perhaps someone could provide some additional content for this reference. 84.203.33.248 (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]