Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstract figurative

Abstract figurative

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Created three years ago, still no sources. Appears to be a Wikipedia invented concept/syllogism. Checked google books and while there is about 309 hits for "Abstract figurative" [1] none of them appear to actually talk about anything like this, rather just use the two words next to each other (like "something abstract, figurative something else") Volunteer Marek 03:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 November 13. Snotbot t • c » 04:14, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A quick Google search reveals a number of people describing themselves as abstract figurative artists, e.g., http://www.josephyork.com, and some online art stores use the term as a category of art, e.g., http://www.absolutearts.com/portfolio/themes/Abstract_Figurative.html. But I could not find any scholarly articles or news articles about this category. Mark viking (talk) 05:36, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No sources. First created in 2009 as a promotional article (see the External Links section) for the site nmotamed.com by User:Motamedd. It's original research for a dictionary definition of a neologism that has remained uncited on Wikipedia for three years. There is no indication that the concept is notable anywhere outside Wikipedia.--xanchester (t) 05:43, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. An unnecessary neologism.--Collingwood (talk) 12:55, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]