Jump to content

User talk:Jenks24

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 186.207.13.186 (talk) at 15:50, 2 December 2012 (→‎Interchange: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome to my talk page! Here's a few notes that may be helpful to read before posting:

  • I will reply here and I probably won't ping you—unless you specifically request otherwise—so you may wish to watchlist this page.
  • If I've left you a message I will have watchlisted your page, so there's no need to leave me a {{talkback}} or ping me (but you can if you want).
  • I prefer to keep conversations on Wikipedia, but you can email me. If you do, you should definitely leave me a note about it; I rarely check my Wikipedia email account without first being prompted here.
  • If you do leave me a {{talkback}}, {{you've got mail}}, or similar, please remember to sign it so that it gets archived by the bot.
  • Click here to leave a message. Remember to sign your post using the four tildes (~~~~).

Greetings. I just noticed your close of the move discussion of this page. Can you please revise that decision in light of Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links/New York villages within towns. The disambiguation project previously reached the consensus that in cases such as this one, the enveloping geographic area would be considered "primary" because anything occurring in the contained village would literally be occurring within the containing town. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:47, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'd still like to hear from you about this. (I also tried to contact UnQuébécois, but that account is blocked due to asserted sockpuppetry) – ὁ οἶστρος (talk) 12:29, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interchange

It was just noted by someone in our community (Interchange) that the Interchange page was deleted a couple of months ago. It appears to have gone two rounds of discussion and yet no one in our community was contacted or notified during this process so we did not get a chance to provide input into the discussion. The reasons for deletion was missing notability, no references from reliable sources and it was commented that, "couldn't find any coverage in reliable sources to establish notability". Surely if our community had been contacted we could have provided a number of links to establish notability such as the following (not exhaustive): http://www.techrepublic.com/article/red-hat-suite-makes-e-commerce-easy/1031400 http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2000121501406PSCYSW

Please consider once again relisting the deletion and letting us know in the community (you can email our mailing list at interchange-users@icdevgroup.org) so that we can provide our input in the discussion this time.

--Pajamian (talk) 07:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request. Interchange also received print publication reviews in the 2000-2003 timeframe. I find it interesting that the Russian Wikipedia page cited more original sources and thus may've been a better-written article: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interchange

--Jon Jensen, jon@icdevgroup.org, 2012-12-01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.136.109.42 (talk) 21:22, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interchange runs stores that have logged billions of dollars in sales, and continue to rack up (at least) hundreds of millions of dollars in sales annually. (Disclosure: I am the original author of Minivend and major author of Interchange.) As Minivend, it was a groundbreaking application-server style store software unlike others on the market. It attracted a fair amount of press coverage, and has been continuously used for over 17 years. It has had many thousands of worldwide installations, and continues to be used in a major way to sell products of diverse companies and organizations including IBM, the US government, and many best-of-category small business stores. -- Mike Heins, mike@icdevgroup.org 2012-12-01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mckyj57 (talkcontribs) 21:58, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I second this request as well. Interchange is running successfully for business and government sites all other the world. It was covered in Linux-Magazin and I did a bunch of talks about in on several Perl/Linux conferences. Racke (talk) 09:05, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interchange

Please consider once again relisting the deletion and letting us know in the community (you can email our mailing list at interchange-users@icdevgroup.org) so that we can provide our input in the discussion this time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.119.110.160 (talk) 22:12, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to ask that my name be added to the list asking that interchange be relisted. I am one of the end users of interchange and find that removing the listing can only deter more users from joing the interchange group. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K2b3kb (talkcontribs) 23:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interchange

Hello it has been brought to my attention that the Wikipedia page for Interchange is pending deletion. As a member of this community and a daily user of this software for over 10 years, I would ask that you please reconsider. Thank you in advance for you time and consideration in these matters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hexfusion (talkcontribs) 11:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete interchange page

Please relist it for further discussion. I work with interchange from 1999.

95.252.247.64 (talk) 14:55, 2 December 2012 (UTC) Marco Mescoli m.mescoli@omnib.it[reply]

Interchange

I am here also to ask you to reconsider the deletion. As a member of the Interchange community I have to say that this should not be deleted and also that we are using Interchange since 2001 until today and that I have plans to use it for another decade here in Brazil, at least. Please reconsider it. Luiz Carlos Maciel Junior lmacielj at terra.com.br