User talk:BD2412

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
It is The Reader that we should consider on each and every edit we make to Wikipedia.

(Thanks to Alan Liefting, via BMK)

Status: Back. bd2412 T (e)

Archives
By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):
Articles-1st/Deletion-1st-2d/Law-1st-2d-3d-4th-5th
Misc.-1st-2d-3d-4th/RfA-1st-2d-3d-4th/Tools-1st-2nd-3rd/Vandalism

Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):
001-002-003-004-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-012-013-014-015-016-017-018-019-020-021-022-023
Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412

fyi[edit]

I have worked on Draft:Anthony D. Sayre. Pyrusca (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Thanks, moved to mainspace. Cheers! bd2412 T 04:20, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Smallpipes, SIA vs DABCONCEPT[edit]

Sorry for not catching that the Smallpipes page had been turned into an SIA. I've run into this sort of resolution once before, but I'm still unsure how to apply WP:DABCONCEPT or when something can be appropriately turned into an SIA. For instance, sometimes you get geographical name dab pages that list a whole bunch of places that have the same name. I suspect this is not a suitable SIA, but how is that different from two different, but related, musical instruments? This seems to be a big hole in my understanding, this is not just some esoteric detail that I've missed. Is there anything I can read to learn more, or is it just a matter of watching long enough to grok it?  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 19:20, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

WP:DABCONCEPT basically asks if you can discuss all the topics under the umbrella of a single broader idea. If you clearly can not (see, e.g., Mercury, Battery, Seal), then the solution is disambiguation. If the topics are closely enough related that you can, then the solution is either a broad concept article or an SIA. bd2412 T 19:36, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, helps a little.  —jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 19:39, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Hillary Rodham Clinton[edit]

I see you have made multiple edits changing Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. These articles were on my watchlist:

I have reverted your edits to the first two articles as they mention Hillary Rodham Clinton in the '90s context and "Hillary Rodham Clinton". With the last one we could go either way. I will refrain from making more reverts, but I will ask you to reconsider how your edits fit into the context of each article. Also WP:NOTBROKEN. Or if there is a centralized discussion about this topic somewhere and you think I made a mistake, please let me know. Politrukki (talk) 12:11, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

  • I am not aware of any "context" wherein we refer to historical figures by any variation of their common name based on the decade in which they are being discussed, outside of their own biography. Perhaps we do so with popes and kings if they adopt a completely different names, but this is not that situation. In this case, in particular, the subject has always been referred to in at least some sources as "Hillary Clinton". bd2412 T 12:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Save NPP some time[edit]

I think it would be reasonable for you request (or give to yourself) autopatrolled. After having created thousands of articles you've met the requirement. Chris Troutman (talk) 08:15, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

BD2412 is an admin.. That should be part of the userrights. unlsess the software doesn't automatically do it. Pyrusca (talk) 15:01, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Second opinion requested[edit]

Please review https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rocket_ship&oldid=prev&diff=734901437 if you have a chance. I don't want to get into an edit war unnecessarily, but it seems to me that the other user misses the point entirely. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 13:06, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

An other CfR discussion for US city categories[edit]

There's a new Categories for Renaming discussion going on about categories of US cities listed in the AP Stylebook. As you have participated in at least one of the more recent discussions in the subject, you may want to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2016 August 17#Seattle. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 20:32, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Fashion (film)[edit]

Thank you for using AWB to fix the links to Fashion (film), which I have redirected to Fashion (disambiguation) per WP:INCDAB, to point to Fashion (2008 film) instead. The first edit was Special:Diff/734796603 to 10th IIFA Awards and the last one was Special:Diff/734798275 to Wendell Rodricks. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Requested move[edit]

HI, I recently moved Achene to Achene (fruit). I did that because I was writing a draft that became Achene, Belgium. On second thought, I should have kept the accent mark above the E at "Achêne". So I was wondering if you can move Achene (fruit) back to Achene. Thank you. Pyrusca (talk) 21:00, 19 August 2016 (UTC)

Court Listener[edit]

Hi-Court Listener is connected with the non-profit Free Law Project. The link is: Court Listener Please take a look and see what you think-thanks-RFD (talk) 18:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

"We work diligently with volunteers to expand our efforts at building an open source, open access, legal research ecosystem" - that sounds an awful lot like a wiki. bd2412 T 19:02, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of James Mallinson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Mallinson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Mallinson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. VictoriaGraysonTalk 22:37, 25 August 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 30 August[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Fixed, thanks. bd2412 T 01:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)