User talk:BD2412

This user prefers to communicate
on-wiki, rather than by email.

Status: Active. bd2412 T

This administrator prefers not to fulfill solicited administrative actions, per Wikipedia:Solicited administrator actions.; Dispute resolution clause: By posting on my user talk page, you agree to resolve all disputes that may arise from your interactions with me through the dispute resolution processes offered within the Wikipedia Community. BD2412
Archives: By topic (prior to June 1, 2009):; Articles-1st/Deletion-1st-2d/Law-1st-2d-3d-4th-5th; Misc.-1st-2d-3d-4th/RfA-1st-2d-3d-4th/Tools-1st-2nd-3rd/Vandalism

Dated (beginning June 1, 2009):

001-002-003-004-005-006-007-008-009-010-011-012-013-014-015-016-017-018

019-020-021-022-023-024-025-026-027-028-029-030-031-032-033-034-035-036

037-038-039-040-041-042-043-044-045-046-047-048-049-050-051-052-053-054

055-056-057-058-059-060-061-062-063-064-065

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Congratulations on hitting 2,500,000 edits! Best wishes. Red Director (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Red Director: Thanks! I knew I was around there. BD2412 T 01:53, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November unreferenced articles backlog drive

Hey there! :) In case you are looking for some articles to add sources to for the upcoming Wikipedia:WikiProject Unreferenced articles/Backlog drives/November 2025, for games articles that you want to look for sources for, you could see if there is something at the RPG, D&D, or B&TG project pages.

I will try to find some time to see if there are more games articles that are unsourced but not tagged as such.

If you want an additional challenge, I could also look for unsourced articles that were redirected, and restore them so that they can count towards the drive!

Best of luck and best wishes, and thank you for doing what you can. :) BOZ (talk) 13:37, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BOZ: I am more likely to focus on law-related articles this time around. Cheers! BD2412 T 16:38, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK and gotcha! Fair enough. These are here in case you need to get some quick points then. :) BOZ (talk) 16:41, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to temporary accounts

Hello, BD2412. This message is being sent to remind you of significant upcoming changes regarding logged-out editing.

Starting 4 November, logged-out editors will no longer have their IP address publicly displayed. Instead, they will have a temporary account (TA) associated with their edits. Users with some extended rights like administrators and CheckUsers, as well as users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will still be able to reveal temporary users' IP addresses and all contributions made by temporary accounts from a specific IP address or range.

How do temporary accounts work?

Editing from a temporary account

When a logged-out user completes an edit or a logged action for the first time, a cookie will be set in this user's browser and a temporary account tied with this cookie will be automatically created for them. This account's name will follow the pattern: ~2025-12345-67 (a tilde, year of creation, a number split into units of 5).
All subsequent actions by the temporary account user will be attributed to this username. The cookie will expire 90 days after its creation. As long as it exists, all edits made from this device will be attributed to this temporary account. It will be the same account even if the IP address changes, unless the user clears their cookies or uses a different device or web browser.
A record of the IP address used at the time of each edit will be stored for 90 days after the edit. Users with the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right will be able to see the underlying IP addresses.
As a measure against vandalism, there are two limitations on the creation of temporary accounts:
- There has to be a minimum of 10 minutes between subsequent temporary account creations from the same IP (or /64 range in case of IPv6).
- There can be a maximum of 6 temporary accounts created from an IP (or /64 range) within a period of 24 hours.

Temporary account IP viewer user right

How to enable IP Reveal

Administrators may grant the temporary account IP viewer (TAIV) user right to non-administrators who meet the criteria for granting. Importantly, an editor must make an explicit request for the permission (e.g. at WP:PERM/TAIV)—administrators are not permitted to assign the right without a request.
Administrators will automatically be able to see temporary account IP information once they have accepted the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy via Special:Preferences or via the onboarding dialog which comes up after temporary accounts are deployed.

Impact for administrators

It will be possible to block many abusers by just blocking their temporary accounts. A blocked person won't be able to create new temporary accounts quickly if the admin selects the autoblock option.
It will still be possible to block an IP address or IP range.
Temporary accounts will not be retroactively applied to contributions made before the deployment. On Special:Contributions, you will be able to see existing IP user contributions, but not new contributions made by temporary accounts on that IP address. Instead, you should use Special:IPContributions for this (see a video about IPContributions in a gallery below).

Rules about IP information disclosure

Publicizing an IP address gained through TAIV access is generally not allowed (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 previously edited as 192.0.2.1 or ~2025-12345-67's IP address is 192.0.2.1).
Publicly linking a TA to another TA is allowed if "reasonably believed to be necessary". (e.g. ~2025-12345-67 and ~2025-12345-68 are likely the same person, so I am counting their reverts together toward 3RR, but not Hey ~2025-12345-68, you did some good editing as ~2025-12345-67)
See Wikipedia:Temporary account IP viewer § What can and can't be said for more detailed guidelines.

Useful tools for patrollers

It is possible to view if a user has opted-in to view temporary account IPs via the User Info card, available in Preferences → Appearance → Advanced options → Enable the user info card
- This feature also makes it possible for anyone to see the approximate count of temporary accounts active on the same IP address range.
Special:IPContributions allows viewing all edits and temporary accounts connected to a specific IP address or IP range.
Similarly, Special:GlobalContributions supports global search for a given temporary account's activity.
The auto-reveal feature (see video below) allows users with the right permissions to automatically reveal all IP addresses for a limited time window.

Videos

How to use Special:IPContributions
How automatic IP reveal works
How to use IP Info
How to use User Info

Further information and discussion

For more information and discussion regarding this change, please see the announcement from the Wikimedia Foundation at Wikipedia:Village pump (WMF) § Temporary accounts rollout.

Most of this message was written by Mz7 (source). Thanks, 🎃 SGrabarczuk (WMF) (talk) 02:48, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good to know, I suppose. Cheers! BD2412 T 03:00, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome BD2412! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2025 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 09:30, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Non-IP IP-talk notice

This is part of a cleanup based on Wikipedia:Request a query#Non-IP user-talk pages with "Blanked IP talk". I pulled a snapshot of the results as User:DMacks/quarry-98734 and am spot-checking. It That's the first I saw that was performed "you" rather than "your bot", and none are by anyone else. Wanna do a quick sweep of them, or should I when I next get in the mood for gnoming? DMacks (talk) 02:45, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DMacks: I have the list. Note that BD2412bot went through and replaced a lot of existing {{OW}} with {{Blanked IP talk}}, so there is no immediate indication where the {{OW}} templates came from. BD2412 T 02:55, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right. Once I saw that they were not all a simple replace-right-tag-with-wrong-tag (fix: undo the replacement), I figured I'd better look at each to see what other ways they got placed. DMacks (talk) 03:11, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I think a substantial aspect of the problem is that the original {{OW}} template just said that older warnings had been removed without specifying that the page was an IP talk page. BD2412 T 04:30, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

* I believe this is done now. Cheers! BD2412 T 05:01, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing and figuring out what had happened. Confirming that the quarry now gives no hits. Whee! DMacks (talk) 07:59, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Klavdiya Gadyuchkina

Greetings. Seeing as you relisted this AfD ~nine days ago, I was wondering if you would be closing it? If yes, when? It's been running for 16 days already. Regards, MattSucci (talk) 13:04, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did not relist with the intent of necessarily closing the discussion myself, but to allow for a clearer outcome for whichever admin did end up closing it. BD2412 T 17:05, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response. I was merely wondering if it would be you to close, seeing as consensus has obviously been reached, it's probably time to close. ;) Regards, MattSucci (talk) 18:17, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just to close the loop, I note that this was resolved some weeks ago. BD2412 T 13:54, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Garrett Morris (politician) has been accepted

Garrett Morris (politician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 18:00, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zephra (opera) has been accepted

Zephra (opera), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 23:33, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Edgar J. Goodrich has been accepted

Edgar J. Goodrich, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 19:03, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Zephra

Thank you for this article. You might consider becoming a member of WP:WikiProject Opera. We would be happy to have you join us. Best wishes.4meter4 (talk) 21:54, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was just resolving a redirect question. I have written up in the past, though, The Doom of Devorgoil and "Alfred" (Arne opera). BD2412 T 22:21, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent.4meter4 (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: James M. Kennedy (military surgeon) has been accepted

James M. Kennedy (military surgeon), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:29, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"20th-" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect 20th- has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 12 § 20th- until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded in this discussion, and proposed disambiguation of 20th and redirection of this variation there. BD2412 T 18:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Cleto Escobedo III

On 13 November 2025, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Cleto Escobedo III, which you nominated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 05:53, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice! BD2412 T 18:29, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

For everything you do and have done for Wikipedia, since 10:14, 20 February 2005.

Sincerely, — The Transhumanist 17:32, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@The Transhumanist:, thank you for all your good work too. BD2412 T 18:30, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional buildings and structures originating in literature has been nominated for merging

Category:Fictional buildings and structures originating in literature has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 01:35, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I have replied in the discussion. BD2412 T 01:45, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

AWB edits

In this [1] AWB edit you altered a filename which broke it. I think the script needs to be adjusted to ignore file names. Traumnovelle (talk) 02:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Traumnovelle: Filenames should not contain punctuation that appears to be an error. I have renamed the file. Cheers! BD2412 T 02:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oliver D. Kessel has been accepted

Oliver D. Kessel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 02:24, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

refill/ng

where is the user manual for refill/ng ?

I want to add a "space" before the "pipe" as in citoid

I want to add a default website name of "full domain name"

https://refill.toolforge.org/ng/

I also want to add templates to citoid

Piñanana (talk) 12:21, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Piñanana: I am only a user of the tool, and have no particular insight into the manual. I presume questions like these would go to Wikipedia talk:reFill. Cheers! BD2412 T 00:07, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your comments

Perhaps you should think a bit before you ascribe a malicious motive to someone's choice of username, as you seem to have done to me. Insanityclown1 (talk) 06:15, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have misread me somewhat. My statement on your talk page, regarding another editor's expressed discomfort with your username, was: Of course, as you know, "insanity" in the law is variously defined as an inability to appreciate the consequences of one's own actions, or to distinguish right from wrong. While there is not a legal definition of "clown", the social definition is well-established, as is the phenomenon of coulrophobia, and there is an entire genre of horror eliciting images of insane clowns, so this seems to be a self-handicapping choice of name. I am not asserting malice here; I do, however, question the wisdom of selecting such a name, which is something that can legitimately be wondered about. I understand that it is reference to a favorite musical group, but lot's of musical groups have names unsuitable for use as a handle in a professional environment, such as one might expect for one aiming to produce a general-purpose encyclopedia. BD2412 T 13:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A general purpose encyclopedia is hardly a "professional environment." Insanityclown1 (talk) 20:33, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the offices of the Encyclopaedia Britannica, or a similar enterprise, and see if that is true. Furthermore, imagine that you try to get a job at a top 1000 law firm, and in this highly competitive hiring environment they ask you (as firms do these days) to provide all identities that you use on the Internet, for screening purposes. Law school taught you how to argue points, but should have taught you some points of professionalism and decorum. That is precisely why when I hold live classes, I require my students to dress as they would to appear in a court of general jurisdiction. Unchecked, you become the persona that you presume. BD2412 T 20:53, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have worked for a top 1000 law firm. Before I attended lawschool I was a paralegal at an amlaw 100 firm. I know what they require. Anyway, I think we have gotten off on the wrong foot, and I would like to extend an olive branch to you. Insanityclown1 (talk) 21:36, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate the olive branch, and the willingness to extend one. As a takeaway, if in the future someone expresses discomfort with your username, take them at their word even if you do not find their feelings on the matter to be rational. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:32, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Clinton A. Galbraith has been accepted

Clinton A. Galbraith, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 13:41, 24 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi, BD2412. I have a question. Is it okay for a user to revert or edit other users' edits (incl. diffs posted as evidence) on talk pages or noticeboards? Do sanctions apply in such cases? Israell (talk) 04:27, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Israell: It should be obvious that reverting or editing other users' edits in a discussion is not allowed, except in rare cases such as removing personal information about an editor. Such cases are generally brought to WP:ANI. BD2412 T 04:33, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see. I asked just to make sure because a user did that to me on the edit war noticeboard earlier today.[2] I subsequently mentioned that incident to my edit war report. Maybe I should also bring it to WP:ANI. Israell (talk) 05:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since this seems to be its own infraction, I've also alerted WP:ANI. Thank you for your assistance. Israell (talk) 05:28, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like they got away with it all! So who will supervise disruption over at the Rihanna article and on its talk page? They are still defiantly reverting and arguing with other editors. Israell (talk) 13:25, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Seth May has been accepted

Seth May, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 03:20, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hart, Austria for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hart, Austria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hart, Austria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

4meter4 (talk) 15:01, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@4meter4: I have improved the article with solid evidence of the existence of the village as a populated place. BD2412 T 19:00, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I withdrew the nomination.4meter4 (talk) 19:03, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad it worked out this way. I have no recollection of creating the article, but given the timeframe and my lack of affinity for the subject, I would assume that it was part of one of our early article creation drives. BD2412 T 19:14, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I completely understand. I created so many unsourced stubs in the early days of the encyclopedia. Sometimes I come across articles, long forgotten, in a horrible state and ask "who wrote this?" and "what were they thinking?" only to discover it was me. Now of course everything I write is scrupulously cited, but that wasn't the culture on wikipedia back in the day, and my own skills at research and writing have improved.4meter4 (talk) 19:17, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

talk page stalker, I closed it out. --CNMall41 (talk) 22:05, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for closing the loop. Cheers! BD2412 T 23:52, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Ties (disambigation)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Ties (disambigation) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 3 § Ties (disambigation) until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 12:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

New report of Linter errors on IP user talk pages

Given some recent posts by you at the idea lab, I thought you might be interested in Wikipedia:Linter/reports/IP user talk pages by Lint Errors. Also please see this note to a bot operator (and the follow-up by another editor). – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:08, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: I will have a look. Cheers! BD2412 T 00:29, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Great work so far! It really helps get useless junk out of the Linter error lists so that we can focus on things that are bigger issues. – Jonesey95 (talk) 02:52, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was able to knock out more than half. I note that many of those remaining fall outside the permissible scope for IP blanking due to the date of the most recent interaction. BD2412 T 02:55, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent. I have updated the query language to catch more IP user talk pages if you want to come back and take another look sometime. I know it can be mind-numbing work, so no rush. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:20, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Jonesey95: Can you generate me a list of such pages that have had no activity since December 31, 2021? BD2412 T 04:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have temporarily limited Wikipedia:Linter/reports/IP user talk pages by Lint Errors to pages that have not been edited since 2020-11-30, which is a full five years ago and gives us plenty to work with. You can change the rev_timestamp to '20211231' if you really want December 31, 2021, and re-run the report. The report is limited to 2,000 pages right now to prevent rendering errors, but there appear to be over 4,000 pages that meet the current criteria. If you process some of the pages, you can manually refresh the report to get a fresh batch. Let me know if there are any errors in the report results; I am not great with SQL. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:49, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This looks very good. BD2412 T 15:23, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2025 Kansas City Chiefs–Los Angeles Chargers game for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Kansas City Chiefs–Los Angeles Chargers game, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Kansas City Chiefs–Los Angeles Chargers game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of minor Greek mythological figures for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor Greek mythological figures is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor Greek mythological figures until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Michael Aurel (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Workman v. Mingo City Board of Education

Do you need help with this? It's very close to being ready. Bearian (talk) 03:49, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearian: I agree that this one is close, and would appreciate any assistance in bringing it to mainspace. This is particularly important given that West Virginia is now seeing a great deal of legal action designed to overturn this decision. BD2412 T 04:26, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did copy edit it. Bearian (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks. BD2412 T 16:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]