Talk:Erector spinae muscles

Medicine Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anatomy Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anatomy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anatomy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnatomyWikipedia:WikiProject AnatomyTemplate:WikiProject AnatomyAnatomy articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has not yet been associated with a particular anatomical discipline.

Untitled

Spinalis Capitis

I just learned that the spinalis muscle does not have a capitis portion because the muscle it merges with superiorly (semispinalis capitis) makes up the entirety of the muscle "spinalis capitis" would be. Unfortunately I don't have a text to refer to right now. Scrycer (talk) 15:03, 13 April 2010 (UTC)scrycer[reply]

Origin & Insertion

The recent edits made me examine the infobox more carefully, and it definitely isn't accurate, especially since the muscle group as a whole has attachments to lumbar vertebrae, the sacrum, etc. Should we just lump all the origins and insertion in together, or somehow subdivide the sections of the infobox for the SP, LD and IL? If the latter, does anyone know how to do this, since I'm terrible at wiki-coding? Mokele (talk) 16:55, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose

Might be worth adding the purpose of the muscle to the article. I'd do it, but I'm not knowledgeable enough. TotallyNotEtreo 18:46, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]