Jump to content

User talk:Kondi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cuffasofas (talk | contribs) at 18:13, 8 June 2013 (Notification). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Help required

Hello, Kondi. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject India/Assessment/Tag & Assess 2012/Untagged/KarnatakaLinks.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Kondi. You have new messages at Sam.ldtite's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Hello, Kondi. You have new messages at Alejandroadan's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hey

Hey Thanks for coming with me. Rangilo Gujarati (talk) 06:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Modi

I have reverted your tag removal at Narendra Modi. Perhaps you were unaware of the section regarding the POV tag that already existed on the talk page and that includes a mention of a dispute that has gone to WP:BLPN and seems likely to end up being at WP:RFC. - Sitush (talk) 12:36, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page. Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This is a non administrator notification, and will be logged as such on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system. 

Sorry man. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:51, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I frankly don't know why you got this notification but others recently have received it after the discussion that happened at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#What_I_would_really_like. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It is things like this which make me believe that wikipedia is a waste of time. Something I have already know of course. But it is not something that happened overnight, it has always been like this, compare with this article on Google Groups alt.wikipedia groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/alt.politics.india/j9kEYaZ7DrQ --Cuffasofas (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]