Jump to content

Flags Act 1953

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 58.164.18.43 (talk) at 09:16, 17 June 2013 (→‎Criticism). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Flags Act 1953
Parliament of Australia
  • An Act to declare a certain Flag to be the Australian National Flag and to make other provision with respect to Flags
Royal assent14 February 1954
Commenced14 April 1954
Introduced byRobert Menzies
Status: Amended

The Flags Act 1953 is an act of the Parliament of Australia which defines the official Flag of Australia. Queen Elizabeth II gave Royal Assent on 14 February 1954 after opening the Commonwealth Parliament during her 1954 Royal Tour. It was the first of the few Commonwealth Statutes enacted by the reigning Monarch.

Flags Act 1953

Flag of Australia

The legislation specifies the colours and construction details for the Australian National Flag and the Australian Red Ensign (also known as the Australian Merchant Flag). It confers statutory powers on the Governor-General to appoint 'flags and ensigns of Australia' and authorise warrants and make rules as to use of flags. Section 8 ensures that the 'right or privilege' of a person to fly the Union Jack is not affected by the Act.

The Act originally contained a serious drafting error in Table A of the Act. The outer diameter of the Commonwealth Star was recorded as being three-eighths of the width of the flag, instead of the true value of three-tenths of the width of the flag. The Act was amended to correct the error in 1954.

Flags Amendment Act 1998

The Flags Amendment Act was passed after the 1996 Australian federal election, during a period where the republican movement was influential, and both the government and opposition parties were committed to bringing the issue to a head as a matter of policy. The Act adds to section 3 of the Flags Act and provides that the present Australian National Flag can only be replaced if a majority of State and Territory electors qualified to vote for the House of Representatives agree. It was described as "the first substantive parliamentary steps towards defining a process for the change of the Australian Flag." [1]

Criticism

During parliamentary debate in the House of Representatives over the Flags Amendment Bill 1996 , Laurie Ferguson MP, Member for Reid, whilst supporting the legislation, raised concerns that, "...whilst the bill cements the idea of a plebiscite, with people being consulted in a manner similar to the consultation on the change to the national anthem, one of the weaknesses of the bill is that it does not set out any long-term process for the consideration of change." Referring to the fact that a future parliament may rescind or even ignore the amendment "...in theory, it is not quite what it is cracked up to be in so far as, theoretically, a new government can alter it at any stage." [2]

The Australian Flag Society has proposed a National Language, Holiday and Flag Bill, as the way forward in response to a petition of certain citizens calling for a parliamentary committee to review the Flags Act 1953 (Cth). [3] [4] [5] It proposes to amend the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (IMP) by way of modifiable provisions declaring, among other things, the existing flag to be the Australian National Flag.

Under the proposed legislative and constitutional refinements, it is envisaged that the Flags Act would remain on the statute books, to provide the construction sheet for the Australian National Flag which would be described in terms of its essential elements in the constitution, thereby settling the question of popular sovereignty in relation to the process for reviewing the design - in whole or in part - with a weighty body of legal opinion against the constitutionality of the current statutory rules in subsections 3(2) & (3), [6] [7] which provide for an instant-runoff for choosing between the existing flag and one or more alternatives, on the basis of universal sufferage. As the device occupying the lower hoist is simply referred to as a "large white Commonwealth Star", points could be added or subtracted by ordinary legislation, according to changes in membership of the Australian Federation, and not by a plebicite as currently required, which would remove what has been criticised as an "anomalous and costly" impediment. [8]

References