User talk:Thargor Orlando
Archives
Edit warring on March Against Monsanto
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Viriditas (talk) 02:04, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Further note: you were previously warned about edit warring here, so this isn't your first warning. Viriditas (talk) 02:08, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I guess someone who was previously blocked for two weeks for edit warring might know, but if you've paid any attention at talk, you'd know we've progressed. And looking further, you template one guy with two reverts, but not the one who supports your POV edits. Pretty telling right there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as Independence Institute, where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag for no reason without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- If you think you are fooling anyone with your pro-Monsanto, ALEC-funded, Independentce Institute lobbying on Wikipedia, you are sadly wrong. Viriditas (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the laugh. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- For a real laugh, review your contribution history. It's clear what you are doing here and you aren't fooling anyone. Your most recent edits to March Against Monsanto were made against the expressed consensus on the talk page and they will be reverted. Viriditas (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's not accurate and it's not wp:agf. North8000 (talk) 17:09, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- For a real laugh, review your contribution history. It's clear what you are doing here and you aren't fooling anyone. Your most recent edits to March Against Monsanto were made against the expressed consensus on the talk page and they will be reverted. Viriditas (talk) 07:20, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the laugh. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- If you think you are fooling anyone with your pro-Monsanto, ALEC-funded, Independentce Institute lobbying on Wikipedia, you are sadly wrong. Viriditas (talk) 02:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Two edits in 5 months is not "edit warring." If you can't understand the discussion on a talk page, perhaps this isn't the hobby for you. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- There has been absolutely no progress on either the talk page or in the article aside from outright deletion of material you solely object to alone. You've also been edit warring on multiple pages such as Independence Institute, where you have repeatedly added a maintenance tag for no reason without any commentary on talk. Again, this is not how we use tags. Editors aren't required to telepathically communicate with you or guess your unstated reasons. And please don't offer another "I don't like it" rationale. Use the talk page if there's a problem, but use it to make good arguments based on evidence, not your personal beliefs. Viriditas (talk) 04:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
- I guess someone who was previously blocked for two weeks for edit warring might know, but if you've paid any attention at talk, you'd know we've progressed. And looking further, you template one guy with two reverts, but not the one who supports your POV edits. Pretty telling right there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 03:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
March Against Monsanto
Just wanted to give you a heads up that I've provided some input regarding your concerns about the undue weight issue given to Thom Hartmann's opinion on the March Against Monsanto page. You can find it on the talk page for the March Against Monsanto under the "Thomas Hartmann undue weight tag" section. Gobbleygook (talk) 15:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks, will review and respond there. Thargor Orlando (talk) 15:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Help!
I'm not sure if I am using this wiki correctly but I am writing to ask you to please protect the page Cindy Rodriguez.
Thank you. Billolielies (talk) 02:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Billolielies
- I'm not an administrator, but I hope you understand how problematic your edits are there. Please go to the talk page of the article if you think such a header is appropriate. Thargor Orlando (talk) 13:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Assistance to protect neutral POV on page
Thargo Orlando,
I have tried with great effort to maintain a balance of opinion in the Controversy section of the page on Mitsuo Fuchida, the lead pilot in the attack on Pearl Harbor. I admit I'm not that experienced on Wikipedia, but despite my best efforts, Binksternet continues to revert and edit to his own POV and bend the content of this historic figure, whom I know much about. I saw your name on Binksternet's (rejected) RFA as "Oppose" and thought, if nothing else, you might have some advice or perhaps help. I am requesting an article page ban here
Thanks for your consideration--TMartinBennett (talk) 23:41, 12 July 2013 (UTC)