User talk:GabrielF
Please create a new section at the bottom so that your comments can be picked up by the archive bot.
Your edits to mel sembler page
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mel Sembler. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Once again, you have deleted well sourced content spuriously claiming the source to be unreliable. I know I should always assume good faith, but given how you behaved last time... in any case i restored the text in question. Snertking (talk) 05:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
challenge accepted
challenge me about your past vandalism? fine, if you want to go there:
well sourced info about trudeau's allegations of buying ambassadorship removed, record of jury awards against straight removed, entire pumpgate text removed, with no explanation other than "major blp issues":
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mel_Sembler&diff=485842728&oldid=485840722
on the talk page you explained that the text was not properly sourced, referring only to the pumpgate text and one single cite, when, if i recall there were at least seven cites fir the pumpgate thing and much more text in the article was removed than the pumpgate stuff. When i challenged you on this on your talk page last time asking why you did not explain all the other deletions in that edit, your only reply was a snide "always assume good faith.
You sure you really wanna go there on this one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snertking (talk • contribs) 06:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mel Sembler, you may be blocked from editing.