This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 75.145.68.89(talk) at 17:37, 5 October 2013(Added comment in support of deletion, way too late). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:37, 5 October 2013 by 75.145.68.89(talk)(Added comment in support of deletion, way too late)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hi! I'll be taking this review. I'll point out all the improvements neccessary to make this article GA compliant in the table below. If you have any questions throughout the process please send me a message or just ask here. Retrolord (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This part seems a bit out of place where it is now: The Mississippi State Department of Health,[9] Santa Barbara County, CA IT Network Division,[10] and several other government bodies use Fishbowl Inventory as an asset tracking system.
I am a bit concerned about this part: (aka ExpressTech Holdings). aka is too coloquial for an article, and this part is only mentioned in the intro. If its in the lead it should be expanded upon in a history section later.
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
Citations needed for the Products section
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
Sufficient references for most things, apart from the products section
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
Article does not need to list every award the company has ever recieved. This section needs to be cut down significantly. Same with the products section.
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
This is article is far from being neutral. The article like an advertisement and is promotes the company. Possibly eligble for speedy deletion as content that is purely promotional?
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6.Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
This is ridiculous. If this page isn't deleted as an obvious product of the Marketing Department of Fishbowl Inventory, what's the point of having rules on Wikipedia at all? I'm not sure what "NPOV" means, but I'm pretty sure it's not this. 75.145.68.89 (talk) 17:37, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]