User talk:Timelezz
Hello, thanks for your contribution to Wikipedia. I saw DrChrissy removed a lot of your contribution. Her disrespect of other editors are notorious. Please see here for her records. 124.170.223.223 (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for making me aware. So far, I think DrChrissy's contributation are quite all right. But it does indeed worry me that s/he adds clarification templates without adding a comment on why so. I've pointed this out to her/him and hopefully s/he will include this on adding the template. Kind regards, Timelezz (talk) 07:27, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Timelezz. Please immediately delete this entire thread. It is entitely inappropriate to post OR host thread headings on your Talk page which contain an editor's name. The editor that posted this is an IP hopper who has been blocked several times before and has been extremely disruptive. I strongly suggest you do not engage in conversation with this IP as they will almost certainly start making false accusations against you - avoid feeding the Troll. I will now explain my clarification template on the article Talk page. All the best. __DrChrissy (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
- Many editors had similar negative experience with DrChrissy. for example PraetorianFury . DrChrissy also had many past cases of defaming other editors, she did it again above. Click here and here to see her past lies.124.149.66.255 (talk) 04:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, just let you know that there is an original research case of DrChrissy on the notice board.
- Have a nice day!124.149.69.224 (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Many editors had similar negative experience with DrChrissy. for example PraetorianFury . DrChrissy also had many past cases of defaming other editors, she did it again above. Click here and here to see her past lies.124.149.66.255 (talk) 04:42, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
- Dear Timelezz. Please immediately delete this entire thread. It is entitely inappropriate to post OR host thread headings on your Talk page which contain an editor's name. The editor that posted this is an IP hopper who has been blocked several times before and has been extremely disruptive. I strongly suggest you do not engage in conversation with this IP as they will almost certainly start making false accusations against you - avoid feeding the Troll. I will now explain my clarification template on the article Talk page. All the best. __DrChrissy (talk) 16:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Timelezz. I am repeating my request for you to immediately delete this entire thread from your talk page. I am allowed to delete this myself under Wikipedia:No personal attacks, however, in the intrests of acting co-operatively, I would do this very reluctantly. Could I suggest that for each minute you leave this thread on your talk page, you are tacitly supporting this personal attack. This will not be looked upon favourably should you or I raise a dispute.__DrChrissy (talk) 16:05, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I understand that you do not like what is written about you. On that point I sympathize. But at this moment I do not consider the above as a true personal attack on you which would allow the removal of text. And not a bit the removal of the whole thread, as most is within the boundaries of normal conversation. I agree, it is a gray area. So perhaps I'll change my mind. Optionally, you can request a moderator to make a decision. I would be fine with that. Lastly, I hope you can see the difference between refraining from censorship and support of the content. Kind regards, Timelezz (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hello Timelezz. It seems pretty clear to me that one editor accusing another editor on a third editor's talk page of "lies" is a personal attack. I also urge you to remove this personal attack from your talk page. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 23:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
- I understand that you do not like what is written about you. On that point I sympathize. But at this moment I do not consider the above as a true personal attack on you which would allow the removal of text. And not a bit the removal of the whole thread, as most is within the boundaries of normal conversation. I agree, it is a gray area. So perhaps I'll change my mind. Optionally, you can request a moderator to make a decision. I would be fine with that. Lastly, I hope you can see the difference between refraining from censorship and support of the content. Kind regards, Timelezz (talk) 21:46, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
- No those are not personal attack. They are factual statements. Evidences from the past were provided203.158.44.182 (talk) 01:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Censored comments on admin noticeboard
Hello, the gang keeps removing my comment on the case of your talk page. I am concern you may miss the information, so I copy it here.
Untrue statements from Acroterion
- The past blocks was not justified
- 'fixated on DrChrissy as an opponent, and who is treating animal rights topics and Wikipedia in general as battlegrounds'. Untrue, what I mostly concern is the neutrality, scientific quality and the democracy of wikipedia.
- "range blocks a lot of Western Australian IPs" Untrue, my Ip were not from western Australia, my ISP don't offer those.
- Drmies is in in DrChrissy's gang, she like to lie, see my past message on her talk page for her past lies, she also told other editors that she has a sockpuppet farm, Acroterion sounds similar to some other ID that appeared in DrChrissy's gang.
- Have a nice day!124.149.45.112 (talk) 03:26, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Email as source
Before reinserting your cite to the email, please discus the matter on Talk:Marius (giraffe), where I have posted my reasons for removing it. DES (talk) 18:32, 15 February 2014 (UTC)