Talk:Interactivity

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Interactivity article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Industrial design Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Industrial design, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Industrial design on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Industrial designWikipedia:WikiProject Industrial designTemplate:WikiProject Industrial designIndustrial design articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human–Computer Interaction (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human–Computer Interaction, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Human–Computer InteractionWikipedia:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionTemplate:WikiProject Human–Computer InteractionHuman–Computer Interaction articles

discussion about this article

I'm curious about the Denis McQuail citation in the "Interactivity in New Media" section. There are far more prominent, creditable, and contemporary academics to site in this field (Murray or Manovich off the top of my head).

I won't personally edit or delete the citation, but it seems like a very conspicuous selection to me. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dakotareese (talk • contribs) 21:01, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

how would you feel about merging this article with the article about interaction? Pe3 08:04, 18 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

better not. facopad

I don't thinkl they are the same: this deals with information, the other deals with the idea of interacting parts--Scorpion451 01:20, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

discussion about interactivity

what about the levels of interaction?

1) interruption

- how often can you interrupt/continue?

2) selection

- how many options, how often?

3) creative conversation

- interactivity can be viewed as an art because it goes through the process of establishing a connection with the individual user. the user becomes a conscious to the mechanical purpose of the technology.

implementation - users intention to do what should be possible merges as a part of the system

- what she does, affects to what is possible to do

(youngblood 1995 pp.240-241) the first two levels we have now, third one is to come. not soon though. let's have a discussion on this will we? ;)

what about interactions not happening between a user and a digital device?

for example the interactions happening between users in a multiuser application. Pe3 15:22, 8 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

From the point of view of new media technologies, the nature of interactivity is a specific issue.

Dags 20. jan 2006: Added a section on (human-artefact) interactivity from a somewhat philosophical perspective. Does this fit in with the rest?

Artist called Interactive?

See http://www.discogs.com/artist/Interactive—Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.48.6 (talk • contribs)

Links Interactive Art

why is this subsection EMPTY? should I delete it? Samus uy 02:39, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]