User talk:TLSuda

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2014 July 7#File:LeAnne_Howe.jpg

Hello, I'd like to request that the file LeAnne_Howe.jpg be undeleted. An appropriate and corrected permissions request has been forwarded to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and should be pending review now. In the mean time, I thought I'd put the needed "OTRS pending" to keep the file from being prematurely deleted. Please let me know if there are additional steps I should take to replace this file. Thanks! --Taylorjhodges (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Hey Taylor! In the future can you put new talk page messages at the bottom of the talk page? That's traditionally where people look for new information. When the file was deleted, I could not quickly and easily find a permission statement by searching. I did not go through every pending email, though, so it is probably there waiting to be processed. As soon as the email is received and processed, the image will be deleted. I'm currently out of town, but if I get the chance, I will try to go through some emails and get it processed. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 03:59, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Windows XP

Since you've chosen to delete images that were used in Windows XP, could you please "finish the job" by making appropriate edits to the article that now contains several redlinks. As it was your decision to delete the files, it really shouldn't be left to other editors to fix the mess that you've left in the article. --AussieLegend (✉) 16:58, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Consensus determined that, I just implemented. There's a bot that will come behind to clean it up. You don't have to do anything. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 17:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

I don't necessarily that there was a valid consensus but, that aside, the table you edited needs fixing. --AussieLegend (✉) 17:12, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

The removal of the images by the bot would've cleaned it up. But, just for you, I've made it more workable. TLSuda (talk) 17:20, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Well no, because the table needed to be reformatted as a result of the files being deleted. The bot wouldn't have done that. --AussieLegend (✉) 18:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Without the deleted images, the table column the top image was in would've shifted. It may not have been perfectly centered, but it would've been okay. TLSuda (talk) 18:03, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Esterel Technologies Logo

Hello, you download the ET logo but you have trunckated half of if. The official logo have the ANSYS part. Could you upload the complete image ?213.30.139.86 (talk) 09:15, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Genes, Brain and Behavior

Hi, thanks for your review of this article, it's my first GA :-) As for other GA articles including abstracting and indexing services, there is currently only 1 other GA journal article, The Accounting Review. It's in only 3 databases (far as I can see), so the section is smaller and not presented as a list. I also just noticed that I didn't respond to 2 of your questions... "Does any source include the reason why the journal went to online only?": I happen to know that it was for financial reasons (not enough paper subscriptions any more), but although the person who told me that certainly is reliable and "in the know", that still is not an RS in the WP sense... I'll keep an eye out for a source, perhaps the society will post some minutes or something like that. "In the reception section, the journals that cited it the most often, it lists this journal itself". That is indeed correct and almost always the case for specialist journals in a smaller field. This journal gets citations from many different journals (it's rather interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary, so that too is to be expected) , so even though it is itself one of the top 5 "citers", the proportion of self-citations is actually pretty low (3%, I've seen journals go over 50%...). Of course, although all these figures can be reliably sourced, their interpretation is mine, so it cannot be included in the article. That's generally a problem with articles on academic journals, because preciously little is written about them (as opposed to articles that appeared in them, but that's a different thing).

BTW, can I pick your brain once more? The bot notice on my talk page mentioned that having been promoted to GA, the article is eligible for DYK. I was thinking of an appropriate hook, but all I can come up with is "...that Genes, Brain and Behavior has developed standards for the publication of mouse mutant studies?" which strikes me as a little bit boring. Do you perhaps have a better idea? Thanks! --Randykitty (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the answers to my questions. Neither of them were specifically required to pass the GA review, so I was fine with leaving them be. I can completely understand the plight of trying to find sources in a situation like this, as it is extremely tough.

That hook actually is interesting to me, but its only mentioned in passing. I would include more information about this in the article, if you are going to use it as the hook. I'm not so good with DYK hooks, I've only successfully done 2. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Jeff Dexter promoting The Twist 1962.jpg

Hello, I think you erred in deleting this file. This was a picture of Dexter as a 14 year old dancing the Twist as discussed at length in the article. Dexter is now nearly seventy so clearly no free equivalent can now be produced of this image as his appearance has changed beyond recognition. Could you undelete it please? Thanks. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:40, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

@Philafrenzy: I disagree that the image isn't replaceable. I also don't think that the image passes WP:NFCC#8. But, as it was speedied, and there is still disagreement about such, I've restored it. Being so, I'm pinging both @Eeekster: and @Stefan2:, so one or the other can take the file through the WP:FFD process. Cheers, TLSuda (talk) 22:32, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

OK. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:46, 14 July 2014 (UTC)

File:CasinoCards.jpg

Hello, TLSuda. I uploadad an altered version of an image you deleted a couple months ago. I would like you to review the image to make sure it's okay. If you don't think it's okay, feel free to delete it. NintendoFan (Talk, Contribs) 02:37, 15 July 2014 (UTC)