Talk:Ejaculation
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ejaculation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image. |
 | Pictures and video: If you are editing this page to contest the picture and video, then please check the archives for past discussions first. There is a "recurrent topics" lists that you can consult. See also WP:NOTCENSORED and Wikipedia:Options to not see an image. |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
Ejaculation article doesn't actually describe ejaculation sources, mechanisms and processes
Does anyone else find it odd that aside from the opening sentence of the article, no attempt is made to describe what ejaculation is and the organs by which it is achieved? There isn't even a link to the prostate, much less a sentence about it. 75.156.153.74 (talk) 19:13, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
Seriously...
A big old hairy cock with grey hairs sprouting out. Couldn't you people at least find a decent example that wasn't some creepy old guy? Sick. 71.212.60.187 (talk) 04:27, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry it's not the cock you dream of. That's not the reason it's there. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:29, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Well, perhaps it's the cock Wikipedia editors dream of - some old fart in his sixties with grey curly-whirlies... Grandpa's cock. Seriously, who needs to look at grandpa's cock? 71.212.60.187 (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Your complaints are off topic. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- The quality of an illustrative image is off-topic? Is that YOUR hair old dick? 71.212.60.187 (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- The image illustrates the topic. Your complaints are off topic. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- This video and pictures are not useful and yes, they are inappropriate. An animation would be far superior in giving greater detail about what is going on. It is a sorry state that immature people are allowed to destroy an otherwise useful article. Wyoungquist (talk) 06:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Wyoungquist: feel free to find or create a freely-licensed animation to help improve this article. DMacks (talk) 07:13, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- What is immature is the reaction people are having to imagery of the human body engaged in a natural biological function. If this were imagery of wonton violence no one would care, but as soon as you depict the human form it's somehow inappropriate. This image is not being used in a sexual context, it is being used for the purpose of education. Grow up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.59.170.67 (talk) 22:29, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
- "If this were imagery of wonton violence no one would care," -- Wait, are you talking about brutality against Chinese dumplings or when the dumplings themselves commit the heinous acts? It makes a difference.209.179.21.14 (talk) 15:54, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- This video and pictures are not useful and yes, they are inappropriate. An animation would be far superior in giving greater detail about what is going on. It is a sorry state that immature people are allowed to destroy an otherwise useful article. Wyoungquist (talk) 06:25, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
- The image illustrates the topic. Your complaints are off topic. - SummerPhD (talk) 05:44, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- The quality of an illustrative image is off-topic? Is that YOUR hair old dick? 71.212.60.187 (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Your complaints are off topic. - SummerPhD (talk) 04:43, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
- Well, perhaps it's the cock Wikipedia editors dream of - some old fart in his sixties with grey curly-whirlies... Grandpa's cock. Seriously, who needs to look at grandpa's cock? 71.212.60.187 (talk) 04:32, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
"The duration of the stimulation leading up to the ejaculation can affect the volume."
Is this in the source given? It isn't in the abstract. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.248.117.26 (talk) 12:05, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
The different fluids that get ejaculated
The reason I looked up the article was to understand the clear part of the ejaculated fluid versus the white part. Sometimes the fluid is entirely white but often it is a mixture of a clear transparent part like the "white" of a raw egg and a white opaque part. My question is why is part clear and part white? If anyone knows the answer I hope they will add that to the article, thanks. Evonj (talk) 15:41, 23 December 2013 (UTC)