User talk:Anupmehra

Anupmehra

Contribs —— Home —— Talk —— Email —— Identity —— Usercheck

Status: Offline

SummerSlam (2014)

I am truly sorry but I was trying to help actually. Yesterday when I opened Summerslam 2014 on Wikipedia, some of the match cards were vandalised e.g instead of John Cena vs Brock Lesnar it was Cena vs Batista and even a completely absurd match up featuring CM Punk taking on Daniel Bryan. I corrected all this but after I corrected Rusev vs Jack Swagger, I couldn't put "Flag match" in a the stipulation side so I mistakenly erased it all, hoping that someone would correct it. Thank you anyways for notifying me. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farrukhsalar16 (talk • contribs) 07:42, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Farrukhsalar16 - It is okay. I just undid your changes because a significant portion of the article was removed without any explanation in edit summary. I can understand that you were trying to help. In my message on your talk page, I've left you few help links, that may help you further while contributing to Wikipedia. You are advised to be bold while correcting/updating encyclopedia, and requested to make your changes to conform Wikipedia guidelines. You may also take a look at our Welcome page. Happy editing! Anupmehra -Let's talk! 15:38, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Crown Group (Crown Group Holdings Pty Ltd) (August 15)

Hi Anupmehra, I was hoping you might be able to assist me to ensure my Wikipedia article is accepted. You declined my submission at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Crown_Group_(Crown_Group_Holdings_Pty_Ltd) Are you able to assist me to ensure it is accepted and demonstrates a more neutral tone. Thanks, Dominique August 18 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominique Kuhne (talk • contribs) 22:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dominique - Yes, I certainly will. The subject appears to be notable for inclusion on Wikipedia. There at present I find only two problem with the draft, one is -promotional tone and the other, original research. Wikipedia neutral point of view guideline explains in detail how should a Wikipedia article ideally be written about. In short, it says..articles should be written without biases presenting significant views published in multiple reliable sources. As a fix, I'd suggest you to start from scratch and re-write only what has been published in reliable sources not what do you personally think of subject. I may edit the draft to write a section or two to illustrate what do really Wikipedia expects for. In the meanwhile, you may continue improving the draft. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 04:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anupmehra,

Thank you for the quick response. If you could edit some of the draft as an example that would be fantastic.

In the meantime, I will continue to work on it.

In terms of the original research, I have have presented mainstream newspapers - considered a reliable source by Wikipedia.

There are no peer reviewed, or other academic sources otherwise to note on this topic.

If I referenced more of the information would I be more likely to have this piece accepted?

Thank you very much for your assistance - I am a first-time contributor. Thanks, Dominique

@Dominique Kuhne: - I need some time to read sources, so I could write a paragraph or two, because -information present in Wikipedia articles must be based on information present in secondary, independent and reliable sources. Let me make it clear what Wikipedia meant by original research, -"if one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources". Also, please note that, -despite the need to attribute content to reliable sources, you must not copy-paste because doing would be a copyright violation and may constitue plagiarism. Articles should be written in your own words while substantially retaining the meaning of the source material. Hope, it does help.

As a side note, when you leave a reply to a message on a talk page, please edit the section header rather than making a new section (click "edit" that appears on right hand side). And remember to sign your posts on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~). It'd generate your signature with date and time. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 04:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Issues relating page of Vivian Dsena

What is your issue with Vivian Dsena? You are not letting anyone fill all the details relating his biography on his page............. Don't play with the hearts of his fans, even if you don't like him. Act neutral since you are an authorised Wikipedia user! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.161.75.148 (talk) 03:59, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Thank you for your warm greeting and for your help offering, I'm afraid I will need lots of it. Best regards! --Tetradracma (talk) 20:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

		The BLP Barnstar
		Your diligence in reviewing pending changes in order to ensure that BLP articles are reliably sourced is much appreciated. Thank you for your efforts! *Jezebel's*Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:37, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar. It is very much encouraging. Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:39, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:JSL Singh

I really dont know whT went wrong at the "JSL SINGH" .. Please help me out — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jslsingh (talk • contribs) 22:01, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jslsingh - I'll help you to understand why the draft created by you could not accepted to move to the Wikipedia articles space and what really is required to be done in order to make your draft eligible for inclusion on Wikipedia. But, I'd like to have answers of few questions to begin with, to assist you better. Are you "Jaspal Singh" the subject of the draft? To reply, just click "edit" on right hand side of section header "Draft:JSL Singh", type your texts below to mine, and click save. And remember to sign your posts typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your post, it'd generate your signature with date and time. Regards, Anupmehra -Let's talk! 22:34, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Guanopsycoitic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{db-reason|1=[Wikipedia:Wikipedia_is_not_a_dictionary|Wikipedia is not a dictionary]].}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

19:04:42, 21 August 2014 review of submission by La.Pasionaria14

La.Pasionaria14 (talk · contribs)
- User:La.Pasionaria14 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Greetings: I would like to know why my article was refuted? Lalita Krishna is an acclaimed film producer based out of Toronto, Canada. If you type her name in Google, it will show up immediately.

Can you just clarify what I need to do so I can make the appropriate adjustments?

Thank you,

La.Pasionaria14 (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]