Jump to content

User talk:Anupmehra/Archive1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     Archive1   
All Pages:  ... (up to 100)


Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Anupmehra! Thank you for your contributions. I am Ansumang and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questionsor type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your nameusing four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

ansuman (talk) 19:54, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dalisays (talk) 10:18, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Gandhi (August 15)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 15:36, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello! Anupmehra, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at theArticles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Please explain

Please can you explain this tagging. It makes no sense to me. - Sitush (talk) 07:27, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Ah Okay! The tag introduced by me to the article was about clean-up, reorganize, removing unsourced claim/an opinion someone desperately wants to be true. The line, Maithils brahmins are one of the two chief divisions of brahmins is baseless asreference cited doesn't support this claim. No results found in reference cited for the 'chief divisions of brahmins'
The lead section highlights the title, Maithil brahmins, but as it goes to description into history section, it cites the contribution/work of Maithils, not Maithil brahmins who inhabited the former kingdom of Mithila(Not all Maithils are Maithil brahmins). Again, The Maharajah of Darbhanga Raj, a neighbouring state doesn't match any texts of the bookEthnology cited as reference.
Later, The unknown maharajah of Darbhanga raj presided over their caste association, Whom and what caste association? Actually he presided over the Maithil Mahasabha and it was an orthodox group not a caste Association(accordingly reference provided)..
I invite you to reorganize the texts of article accordingly references available or put the maintenance tag back.AnupMehra ✈ 10:52, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Udumalai Narayana Kavi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain please?

Could you explain the reason behind your reorganize tag on this page? I'd be happy to improve it, but I don't know what specifically you were referring to. Geo47 (talk) 08:52, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah sure! The article seems to be a biography of a living person(WP:BLP). It misses lead section(WP:LEAD). The present content of the article could be placed under section 'Career' attributed to the person individual, biography is being written for. And, it is supposed to mention achievements in the ascending order unlikely present one, as 'He is a graduate of Waimea High School and Drake University'(No source for it. Most probably, he finished high schooling at Waimea High School and graduation from Drake university. If correct, then need to be re-written or removed, as biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification.), following 'He was first appointed to the Senate'. Hope, it resolves. If doesn't, please write a comment. Thanks! AnupMehra ✈ 09:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I understand now. Thanks for the reformatting. I just made some grammar fixes but they're minor. Also, I've never seen candidate names italicized before (as in the discussion of the candidates he's defeated). Is that the proper formatting?Geo47 (talk) 00:30, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Um, I'm not sure. Actually I've no idea. As those names (probably) are still waiting to fall under wiki notability guideline, for articles to be created, placing them inside boxes, highlights red, something not so cool. Whether they should be italicize or mark bold or left natural, as they are defeated candidates doesn't sound legit. It is not about them, but an another person whom they contested with. I'm leaving it up to you, whatever goes more real with wiki projects. I've seen some articles where candidates name were italicized, not sure whether they were appropriate or looking for an edit. And an another thing, have you some source regarding, Kouchi's marriage status? I noticed you changed 'was' to 'is'. Are you sure he's still into marriage not divorced? The source says, 'Ron and his wife, the former Joy Tanimoto, have two sons'. Cheers! AnupMehra ✈ 07:50, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, I see. Thanks for the explanation. And yes, the source is his campaign website. In English, the word "former" before a wife's name simply means that she was formerly known as Joy Tanimoto before she replaced her maiden name with her husband's name (Kouchi). Geo47 (talk) 15:49, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Damn! I apologize for my misconception of the word, 'former'. You might would like to pay a visit tothis linklink2, which says, 'Senator Kouchi graduated from Waimea High School in 1975 and attended Drake University in Des Monies, Iowa.' contradicting to 'Kouchi received his high school diploma from Waimea High School and his Bachelor's degree from Drake University (in Des Moines,Iowa).' High School diploma is not graduation, butbachelor's degree is. Right? AnupMehra ✈ 16:54, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it's the other way around, but that's actually a good point that I didn't catch. It says he received his high school diploma which means that he graduated from high school. However, in both sources, it says that he only attended Drake University which, to me, implies that he didn't graduate (or else they would have said "graduated from Drake" or "received his Bachelor's from Drake". We can't know for sure, so I'll go make the change to your original wording now. Nice catch!Geo47 (talk) 08:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashoka's policy of Dhama (August 29)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 17:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah it sure is. I've been thinking about title, thought Ashoka and his Dhamma would be more appropriate and real than present one(with rectified typo 'Dhama'). AnupMehra ✈ 06:51, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asaram Bapu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ahmadabad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:30, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nadile Sultan may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ((refimprove|date=September 2013}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:49, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chadhar

Hi, I appreciate that you are trying to save Chadhar from deletion but it seems clear to me that you do not yet fully understand our reliable sources policies. Things like discussion forum posts, books published by Gyan, British Raj sources from the 1880s and completely irrelevant lists of surnames simply will not do the job. Of course, you are welcome to search further for sources but the chances of you finding them online are pretty slim - I'm good at sourcing and have done those checks. I even mentioned the Gyan book at the AfD, although not by name. B. S. Nijjar & someone else both quote an 1880s Raj source but other than that, there really is nothing out there. - Sitush (talk) 16:17, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You just reverted my edit again. Citing one of the sources is not reliable. Please delete the respective unreliable source, why the other one? Explain? It might be a human error. AnupMehra ✈ 16:21, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) AnSI is not usually thought to be reliable because it just takes huge chunks from old Raj books - it was a political exercise and the level of scholarship was generally appalling. However, I cannot see the page that you have just cited and would appreciate some more info about that one. - Sitush (talk) 16:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
here it is, pg.282. AnupMehra ✈ 16:26, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot see that (User:Sitush/Common#GBooks may explain why). That AnSI source is mostly just a list of names, linked to when a name occurred in a census, even if it was wrongly spelled or wehatever. Raj censuses were not reliable and in any event it is not enough to source that x, y or z appears in a source - the source has to discuss them, give them some sort of meaningful coverage etc. - Sitush (talk) 16:31, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, and just in case you are doing this - snippet views are not acceptable. A lot of people try to us them and they very frequently take things out of context. Can you possibly quote the relevant paragraphs from the book? It is unlikely to be very long. - Sitush (talk) 16:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It might be just a list but if reliable, should be kept. Yeah the url of the respective page has kind of fragment view. And, perhaps we can not(or should not) ignore the book tagging 'Gbook'. It's a real book. If snippet view makes a change, then books should be cited without the url? There would be no question anymore thereafter, I guess. [1],[2]. Please have a look at them, meanwhile I dig more. Update the ref serction of the article, if they are reliable source. Thanks! AnupMehra✈ 16:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There are some more reliable sources, but the online preview is not available. Like, 1, 2. I do not think it should a reason for not citing them. If it could be one, then tons of other articles should be get deleted along with this one.AnupMehra ✈ 17:01, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OSE. And I suggest that you read the opening nomination at the AfD before sending us off to see search results for "chadhar surname" on Google. - Sitush (talk) 18:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah! Thank you very much! You're talking about an AfD, what we already are doinghere. It would be perhaps much better If we discuss one thing at one place. AnupMehra✈ 13:32, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Ashoka's policy of Dhama was accepted

Ashoka's policy of Dhama, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

APerson (talk!) 18:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

deletion

You placed a deletion tag on this article. I am not clear what you intend. Do you want to move it to "Ashoka's policy of Dharma", which is how we normally spell the word in WP. If so, I can do it for you--just let me know on my user talk page. If that is your intent, you will also need to change the spelling of the word wherever it appears in the article--I can also do that for you efficiently.

There are a few other problems with this article:

  1. the links you have put in do not necessarily go where you intend . For example, liberality redirects to Liberalism. which is a different political concept. Our article on harmony is exclusively about music-- please check all your current links.
  2. Additional links are needed for other words at the first occurrences. TAll names of people and places need to be linked
  3. The article is written as an essay, not an encyclopedia article. The tone needs to be mroe formal: we usuall omit connecting phrases "To understand the various aspects of the policy of Dhamma and the reasons for its formulation it would necessarily need to sketch the historical background against which it became possible for Ashoka to enunciate it." does not really add anything: the heading you use "Historical background" says it by itself.
  4. We do not use FULL CAPITALS in articles for headings.
  5. The contents of the article iss overwhelming positive, as if it were meant to promote his vision of society. Surely there is some negative or less partisan commentary also.
  6. We already have an article on Edicts of Ashoka. It may need to be expanded.
  7. The section, text of the edicts is unclear--which particualar inscription is it, or is it a synthesis of multiple inscriptions? DGG ( talk ) 14:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


I left you a msg on your talk page related to the problem specific. And about the other concerns listed, are as follow:

  1. Yesterday I made an attempt to fix 95 dab errors pointed by 'DPL bot' using dab solver. It seems, there's still some error(s) exist and need to be fixed manually. Thanks for bringing it up, I'll try rectifying.
  2. Regarding this one, I'm wondering if there's some bot fixing up this kind of thing. It is kind of time consuming, I'll do it though once I get time enough.
  3. And yeah some lines need to be removed, or re-written as per Wikipedia style of writing.
  4. Um, I'm sorry but I didn't get it exactly, what do you mean by, 'FULL CAPITALS IN HEADING'? Let me guess, For eg. There's a heading 'Dhamma causes', another 'Contents of Dhamma'. Do you want me to re-write 'Contents of Dhamma' as 'Contents of dhamma'?
  5. The negative aspect never grown enough to be written by authors/historians. There's no reference(s) available regarding this perspective. However, there were few concerns and I tried to sum them up. As the policy faced reluctance from a particular sector of society, called Brahmin class, as the policy talks about abolition of sacrifices. And few more.
  6. The article Edicts of Ashoka deals with inscriptions of Ashoka. While the article, Ashoka's policy of Dhama deals with a particular policy termed 'Dhamma' by Ashoka, one of the greatest ruler of Indian sub-continent. It can be summerised as an earliest attempt of Emperor Ashoka to unite people belonging to different regions and religions under one rule through this policy. The policy had a significant impact and it has been argued if it was the prominent reason which led to the decline ofMauryan empire. Ashoka used medium of Edicts to propagate his, this policy. The article 'Edicts of Ashoka' has its own imperfection. The article relies on minimal references, and the article Edicts of Ashoka, interprets that Ashoka used medium of Edicts to propagate the idea of Buddhism. Yesterday I left a msg on the talk page of article seeking need to re-write the article. I'll do it my own, once I get time enough to do it. The article Edicts of Ashoka is a part of the articleAshoka's policy of Dhamma, and it is notable enough to have it, its own article. for 'Edicts of Ashoka', Edicts of Ashoka, Google books search result,Search result for 'Ashoka's policy of Dhamma,Ashoka's policy of Dhamma, Google books search result. It would be kind of tedious to put both article into one.
  7. The section, 'Text of edicts' has inline citation(s), One seeking more info. regarding texts could dig the reference(s) cited. I didn't wanted to enlarge the size of the article any bigger. AnupMehra ✈ 18:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chander (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shining (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chander (surname)

Please can you rewrite Chander (surname), which you recently created. Some of the sources are poor and in any case you have completely misrepresented them in statements such as the name referring to a "production house". - Sitush(talk) 18:19, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've just noticed that you have even spelled the name wrongly throughout and that is despite me only recently pointing out your error regarding that in relation to the Chadhar AfD. We already have Chandler (surname) and that is where any content that survives your clean up should go. - Sitush (talk) 18:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Did you read both articles? i.e. Chandler (surname) & Chander (surname). Both are two different article on a single topic, One is a disambiguation page, while other deals with history and origin of the subject of the article. And Yeah, The newly created article waiting for review needs improvement and some better sources added. Like, production house should be replace by manufacturing unit or something alike. Thanks for your suggestion, I'll try improving/rectifying. The problem is I'm kind of busy these days, i.e. over study load. By the way, I'll do it once I get time enough to do it. Just wondering the time you wasted leaving me a 40-50 words msg on my talk page, You could try improving the article and leave your comments in edit summery. Nothing, but just a thought! AnupMehra ✈ 13:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Do you know what? I was going to help you out because you clearly have some competence issues and I thought that I could assist you through the maze that is Wikipedia. But not after your latest replies, sorry. I know a lost cause when I see one. -Sitush (talk) 20:07, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No, you were not. You were kind of stalking me. You're actually comparing a disambiguation page and an article page. You might, would like to read this. And about Chander and Chandler concept,read this. Or this one. Hope it clarifies your concept. AnupMehra ✈ 13:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ashoka's policy of Dhamma

I have restored this article; please do not play around with CSD tags if you don't know how to use them. GiantSnowman 14:11, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The present article was created under a typo errored title, 'Ashoka's policy of dhama' (It should be dhamma). I asked it peoples at #en.wikipedia Irc channel regarding renaming the title of the article. They suggested me to read WP:MOVE and there's nothing like renaming on Wiki but Moving. So, I moved the article to the title it should have correcting that typo, 'Ashoka's policy of dhamma'. Later Wiki had one article under two different names, one of which was a typo. I was meant to delete that typo title, User Marklug onto #en.wikipedia Irc suggested me to use that particular template to delete the page. I did. Didn't thought both pages would be deleted. SO, it is the story! AnupMehra ✈ 14:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Scott Alexander (politician). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 01:00, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ralph Nevins

Dear Anupmehra, Thank you for reviewing the page. You state that in the Ralph Nevins page there are not reliable source as coverage in news or magazine. This is what I exactly did before submitting. I added two reference to the "ASHRAE Journal" and to a book. There are more reliable sources than just news. Moreover, the subject of the article died many years ago, where it is difficult to find digital records of news and magazines. The book is an independent and reliable source. Best, Stefano — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stefano Schiavon (talk • contribs) 14:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Perhaps you are talking about this one. Actually I did not say they are not reliable sources, but the subject of the article requires additional independent reliable sources to verify the content of the submission. Presently, the submission heavily depends upon two affiliated sources. If he is notable, he must have been published in various news papers, magazines, journals, books, etc. Try searching news archives, Google news archive,Wsj archive, Nyt archive,Times archive,Guardian archive, etc. There might be many more. Some claim(s) are unsourced, like He spent a year in the military and joined the faculty at Kansas State University as an instructor, I suggest you to either remove or cite them. His published works could be cited usingGoogle books. Just search and update references section, and re-submit. Hope, It solves. If doesn't, please leave me a comment below. AnupMehra ✈ 15:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

International Federation of Pedestrians

Thank you for taking your time to evaluate the creation of the article on the International Federation of Pedestrians. My submission referenced above was rejected by you with the following comment: "It requires additional reliable sources to verify the content of the submission. The section Mission should be re-written in compliance with Wikipedia neutral point of view.". The Mission of the organization by definition is not a NPV - this section just states in a neutral and factual way, what is the Mission of the organization. How should I proceed with this - many articles on organizations (NGOs for example) in wikipedia do state what is the Mission of each of those organizations. Considering the lack of reliable sources: the article already cites four reputable International Organizations as sources: Union of International Associations, The Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center (PBIC), the Alliance of NGOs for Road Safety and Walk21, also cites "Google Scholar" and "Google Books". When it will be considered enough? Thank you. Mario J Alves (talk) 09:02, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The submission heavily relies on the primary/affiliated sources(4 out of 7 sources are, website). Reference no.3 cited in the history section is the google books search result, You need to cite the particular book and the page no.(s) which support the content of the submission. Reference no.4 cited, again in the history section is aa book, but it doesn't verifies the content of the submission, as there's no page no. mentioned, It doesn't either have a preview to perform verification. Similarly the Mission section deals with aim of IFP, but the only reference(againprimary source) cited, states visions/principles of International Charter of Walking, it doesn't say a thing about IFP, like IFP promotes or supports the visions of ICW as claim made in the article. Wikipedia requires third party, secondary reliable sources to verify content of the submission. The article also requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to verifynotability of the subject. On Wikipedia, notability is a guideline to decide whether a topic can have its own article or not. Just add some additional third party, secondary reliable sources, enough to verify the content of the submission and establish notability, and re-submit. I tried to answer all queries, if there's still some remain, feel free to make a comment below to this. AnupMehra ✈ 12:46, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CN Times

Hi there! I'm curious to know why this article on CN Times Books was rejected for reading more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia page. It merely states facts about the company. Perhaps you could give me an example so that I can use this to help me rewrite the article best.

Thank you for looking through it, and I look forward to your feedback! — Precedingunsigned comment added by CN Times Books (talk •contribs) 12:18, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! The article is not written in compliance withWikipedia neutral point of view. Re-write the article from neutral point of view and re-submit. You might be interested in reading How to write a better article. There's some references listed under references section. But you need to cite them. If you need help with citing, please see referencing for beginners. And Yeah, as I left you a msg. on your talk page regrading your username, It seems that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or accounts that are shared. If you are willing to use a personal account, please take a moment tocreate a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read Wikipedia Conflict of interest guideline and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide, and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate Wikipedia policy, please leave a note explaining why. Thank you. AnupMehra ✈ 13:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References on Articles for creation/Kiuwan

Hi Anupmehra,

Thanks for your review.

Could you please elaborate the problems you see in the article references? I have just made some adjustments to them and plannig to resubmit shortly.

Your feedback will be helpful.

Thanks again, J. — Preceding unsigned comment added byJavier.salado (talk • contribs) 12:44, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Javier.salado: Hello, Perhaps it is this article, you're talking about. Here, History and How it works section is unsourced. Please provide reference(s) andcite them in the body of the article to verify the content of submission. And please refrain make writings like, "available for download from GitHub.", as what last reviewer commented, it could be argued that it looks more like an advertisement than an encyclopedia entry. You should to read Wikipedia neutral point of view. Neutral point of view stress representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without bias, all of the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic. Fix all these issues, before you make re-submit. Hope it helps, if doesn't, leave me a new query just below to this line. AnupMehra ✈ 13:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anup, thank you for your comments. I have rephrased some of the content to have a more neutral point of view. Regarding the references of the sections you mention, there are not many references besides the published articles about this particular application and the documentation and website of the application itself. I have added these references to those sections. they are definitely verifiable, another thing is what you, or other reviewers, may think of their reliability. In my humble opinion a reference to the source is very reliable. I'll wait for your comments and re-submit for revision shortly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javier.salado (talk • contribs) 13:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Javier.salado: It is not what I or other reviewers think, but Wikipedia guidelines and policies. See, What Wikipedia think of reliable sources, independent sources and reliable source examples. If you've improved the article, re-submit it to articles for creation. Someone would review it very soon. Please note that, the Articles for creation process is very highly backlogged, be patient. AnupMehra ✈ 17:03, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about rejection of the draft based on providing unreliable sources

Dear Anup Mehra

Hope your day was fine. I primarily research and source data on anthropology, Buddhist and Taoist death rites. As part of my work I created an article about Ang Jolie Mei, a female funeral director in conservative Singapore. I am sending this message to bring your attention to that article draft , which you rejected by citing lack of unreliable sources. I request your attention to the article one more time. I had provided sources of print articles published about Ang Jolie Mei. The articles were only on print and not all have online access. All the publications that ran the story were owned by Singapore Press Holdings and MediaCorp, which are the national media groups in Singapore. If you insist, I can present scanned copies of the print articles, which I had mentioned as sources. I request you to assess the article one more time.

Regards Petson Peter AKA Writer Wrench

Have a nice day :) — Preceding unsigned comment added byWriterwrench (talk • contribs) 02:09, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Writerwrench: Yeah kind of, guess you had as well. I just revisited thesubmission page to figure out if I've been done a mistake. Nope. The submission relies on some news paper articles(without urls) and two YouTube videos. Personal Life and Advocacy section is unsourced. There are few other places which requires inline citation(s), like, Jolie acquired her funeral celebrant certificate from Australia’s Celebrations Training in 2010. She is also a certified funeral director from Canada’s Mount Royal University since 2012. The content of the submission could not be verified by the sources provided. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Or You can also look into The Strait Times News archive enquiry and Press Holding News archive. There should be tons of other. Actually, It is not necessary to provide url address for new paper sources, but better if you give to verify the content easily in most efficient manner. Article should be based onreliable, third-party, published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. However, official channels of notable organisations may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as asecondary source if they can be trace to a reliable publisher. Perhaps you might be interested in reading,What Wikipedia have assessed to be a reliable source. Update the article with some more sources and re-submit. Does it help? AnupMehra ✈ 04:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Benner citation addition

Thanks for your comment on https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_G._Benner&oldid=573886411/..... Am looking back into my prep notes to write the reference(s) you suggest. JaneFaber (talk) 20:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@JaneFaber: Ah, great! If need help on finding sources, try Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. Or something else, you can always leave me a msg. here. AnupMehra ✈ 04:21, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Style guides aren't crystal clear on how to cite a CV printout and same CV data online in a format acceptable for WP text. Chicago Manual of Style and other standard sources didn't help but APA style was recommended by the "Ask A Librarian" site. So will add that reference plus others, and more Wikilinks. Extra research routes you gave are good to know. JaneFaber (talk) 07:08, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Goagar/sandbox

Hi, could you please help me understand specific examples of issues with references so I could fix it. Also is there any time-frame before which I need to resolve the identified issues or as long as article is improved on continuous basis it should be fine... thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added byGoagar (talk • contribs) 18:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Goagar: Yeah sure, but you need to specify the particular submission page first, you are concerned with. Link please? And answer to the second question is, 180 days(6 months). It might be deleted under section G13 of thecriteria for speedy deletion. AnupMehra ✈ 18:58, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup Mehra, Thanks for your inputs on timeframe. could you please help me understand specific examples of issues with references so I could fix it.

Please find below the url for my article- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Goagar/sandbox


Also I have taken care of two issues below. Could you please let me know if it looks OK now or needs further improvement?

Comment: Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source. Better directly use the sources listed to support the particular content.

"In 2009, Neev raised $500,000 from Basil Partners, a venture capital fund focused on opportunities in SMEs catering to IT/ITeS and technology sectors. The fund primarily invests in Indian/Asian companies that seek to expand into global markets or US/European companies that have an India/Asia centric offshore-based model." seems to be copy-pasted from here. Please re-write them.

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 19:39, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Goagar: Thanks for the article link, The first comment relates to Earlier citation style, Wikipedia is not considerable a reliable source, hence one Wikipedia article could not be used as a source to cite in support of claim/statement made in some other Wikipedia article. It is advised to directly use the sources listed in Wikipedia article to use in other Wikipedia article. For more info. see WP:CIRCULAR.
Second comment is related to Wikipedia copy-paste policy. It says, As a general rule, do not copy and paste text from other sources. That's why I asked you to re-write what I found copied-pasted from other sources. If there's something else copied-pasted, re-write them in your own words.
I see some new sources cited in the article. Topic seems to be notable. Re-analyzing the article. I'll leave you a comment there. AnupMehra ✈ 20:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, Thanks for clarification. Will wait on further your further inputs.Thanks!!

@Goagar: I've left you a comment on the submission page. Please improve the article accordingly suggestion and re-submit. It is likely to be created thereafter. If need help, write me a query below to this line. AnupMehra ✈ 10:27, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Anup, Understood the inputs you provided. Just wanted to clarify if the below video will qualify to be provided as references for neevtech. This does not directly speak about neevtech as an organization but was a talk on the recent motion detection technology neevtech is working on

https://hasgeek.tv/jsfoo/2013-1/681-using-camera-motion-detection-in-js-for-gestures-based-interaction

Appreciate all your feedback so far on this article.

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 16:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Goagar: YouTube and other video-sharing sites are generally not considered reliable sources because anyone can create or manipulate a video clip and upload without editorial oversight, just as with a self-published website. However, official channels of notable organisations may be acceptable as primary sources if their authenticity can be confirmed, or as a secondary source if they can be trace to a reliable publisher. Perhaps you might be interested in reading, What Wikipedia have assessed to be a reliable source. AnupMehra ✈ 17:44, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, got it..will work on this point and revert back to you. Thanks!! — Precedingunsigned comment added by Goagar (talk •contribs) 04:10, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, I have found some additional sources from CNBC and Amazon. Could you please advise if these could considered as reliable published?

This is from CNBC TV, Rajeev Suri: http://thoughtleadership-guru.blogspot.in/2012/08/saurabh-chandra-neev-technologies.html

This was created by Amazon: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b7QlmnrTK3Q&feature=player_embedded

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 10:24, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Goagar: AWS link is likely to be accepted as primary source. While the other one, not sure if not edited by the blog publisher, It would be much better if you could provide the direct link associated with the authentic publisher. Such as, direct link to the CNBC Official YouTube channel or website. AnupMehra ✈ 16:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup,

Certainly...i will try to search for direct link for CNBC one.

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 10:12, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup,

I could not find the direct link for CNBC one. This video was created and posted on Rajeev Suri's YT channel and there is no other known source. Rajeev was a CNBC Young Turk.

Just wanted to check if it would be appropriate to re-submit the article with higher probability of creation with the Amazon reference ?

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 14:28, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, Appreciate if you could provide some inputs / directions on my above questions so I can work on the next steps.

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Goagar(talk • contribs) 17:13, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, I have added references in the article. Could you review once and provide feedback? Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added byGoagar (talk • contribs) 10:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Anup, I have made some additional improvements, added references and open source contributions made by Neev Technologies. I have re-submitted the article. Could you review and provide feedback?

Thanks!! — Preceding unsigned comment added byGoagar (talk • contribs) 06:56, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DPS Azaad Nagar

Hello Anup ,

Hope you are doing great !

Kinldly review dis page again for us !

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/DPS_Azaad_Nagar

I have done ammendments in Referance ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aks2103 (talk • contribs) 09:28, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Aks2103:The Articles for creation process is very highly backlogged. Please be patient. I've left you a comment on the submission page, Please improve the article meanwhile.AnupMehra ✈ 11:27, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help for citation of the page Pt._Raghunath_Academy_Of_Santali_Cinema_&_Art

What were the citation errors have you find, & what type of references is required for this page could you please,describe in detail & help me out to improve this page. — Preceding unsignedcomment added by Sbmurmu09 (talk • contribs) 13:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbmurmu09: Cite references in the "History", "Selection of title" sections, and some more in the "Activites" section. Dainik Jagran inline citations(no.6&7) doesn't help verifying the content of the submission as it leads to home page of website not the related content it was cited for. Rectify these errors and re-submit. AnupMehra ✈ 16:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am an individual not a company . So not representing a company specifically. Thanks .(Epegamedia (talk) 19:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)).[reply]

Your GA nomination of Ashoka's policy of Dhamma

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ashoka's policy of Dhamma you nominated forGA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssriram mt -- Ssriram mt (talk) 22:32, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

Welcome to the Teahouse Badge Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia.

Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing!

Your GA nomination of Ashoka's policy of Dhamma

The article Ashoka's policy of Dhamma you nominated as a good article has failed; see Talk:Ashoka's policy of Dhamma for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ssriram mt -- Ssriram mt (talk) 00:52, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Cambodian League for the Promotion and Defense of Human Rights (LICADHO)

I have edited and resubmitted the proposed article for creation referenced in the subject line (LICADHO).

Your points re not establishing notoriety were well taken. In the initial section, I added several mentions (with citations) of the organization's prominence - citations in local media, citations in the international media, op-eds written by LICADHO's director, etc. Hopefully this is sufficient.

In terms of the background info about LICADHO, I kept most of the sourcing as LICADHO's own page. This is because it's fairly mundane stuff - where they work, how many offices they have, etc. This sort of info is mostly easily gleaned from the organization's own page. Hopefully this is sufficient for publication. There may be more out there, but a lot of it is in Khmer and is difficult to cite.

Link here:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cambodian_League_for_the_Promotion_and_Defense_of_Human_Rights_%28LICADHO%29

(apologies - I may have submitted it twice) — Precedingunsigned comment added by 197.237.89.130 (talk) 12:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sci fi Summer Atlanta

hello. i have questions about your review of the sci fi summer con atlanta article. there were 2 messages in the review, one that the sources werent good enough, and two that i needed to cite sources in the article itself not just in the reference section. is that correct?? the sources i gave point to exactly information that i described, so how are they not reliable references? and, why do i need to cite sources in the body text if i fill out the reference section?? isnt that the point of a reference section?? so, i have trouble right now understanding what or why the reference problems were described, so i need help with that. thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by209.179.85.129 (talk) 16:59, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles must be notable as per Wikipedia guidelines and policies. Wikipedia doesn't publish personal opinions or original research. So, it requires significant coverage in reliable sources that are independentof the subject to establish notability and verify the content of the submission. Please read WP:RS to learn about reliable sources. You should to read, Wikipedia reliable source examples as well for further clarification. And why you need to cite the sources in the body of the article, it is because Wikipedia's Verifiability policy requires inline citations for any material likely to be challenged, and for all quotations, anywhere in article space. That is why it is necessary to cite the respective reference in the body of the article to support the particular claim/statement made in the article to help Wikipedia readers to understand the content of the article. In short, Citations are used to identify the reliable sources on which an article is based. Does it help? AnupMehra ✈ 17:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Holy Incense: The Jewish Prescription at the time of the Temple

Dear editor, You mentioned that my article on the Holy Incense, User:Davidbena/draft article on Holy Incense , was rejected because it sounded more like an essay than an article fit for an encyclopedia. In this assessment, you may be right. May I kindly ask you, though, to give me a brief example of how I can change the current style into a style that you are looking for. I will re-edit the entire work and after I have met your criteria I will re-submit the article. I only need an example to follow, so that I will know specifically how to improve the article.

Were there any aspects of the article which are good and acceptable, or is the style completely unacceptable and needs rewriting?Davidbena (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Davidbena: Please see Wikipedia manual of style. And How to write a better article. Texts of article should be in compliance with Wikipedia neutral point of view. AnupMehra ✈ 18:01, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

about my article on GAERS

Hi Anupmehra

Many thanks for your feedback on my article. In fact, I was not finished with the preparation of this article when I pressed on the submission button.I have many other information and, most of all, references to add. I am a scientist but a real beginner with Wikipedia pages. I will follow the tutorial and revised my article seriously before resubmission. I may need your help...

Best regards

Antoine — Preceding unsigned comment added by88.172.132.124 (talk) 19:46, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be happy to help but I need a link to the article first, please? AnupMehra ✈ 01:00, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Xsolla Submission declined on 20 September 2013 by Anupmehra (talk).

Hello Anupmehra,

could you please be more precise in your comment for the decline of this submission? I have included a number of independent and reliable sources, among which are interviews with Xsolla CEO for UBM Techweb Game Network, Hopes and Fears magazine, website of gaming exhibition GDC, as well as numerous news releases by game publishers and payment providers.

What would your other suggestions be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmnod (talk • contribs) 00:20, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Fmnod: The submission is not in compliance with Wikipedia neutral point of view. Some lines/sections need to be re-written as per WP:NPOV. AnupMehra ✈ 00:57, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
@Anupmehra:, the changes have been made to the original article. It now lists a number of reputable sources and achievements by Xsolla and its founder, could you please review it once again?

Thank you in advance, FMNOD

Pete & Gerry's Organics Article

Requesting help for legitimate sources. Thank you!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Pete_%26_Gerry%27s_Organic_Eggs#Pete_.26_Gerry.27s_Organics — Preceding unsigned comment added by76.97.70.52 (talk) 18:49, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL and see referencing for beginners. AnupMehra ✈ 19:50, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Carlos Latuff. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question on CommentJks825 (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC) on Stax Inc.

{Whisperback|jks825|Stax Inc.} Jks825 (talk) 22:14, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on Jks825's talk page. AnupMehra ✈ 08:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

You have new message/s Hello. You have a new message at Saxenanishank's talk page.

Hey! User: Saxenanishank, You left me a Whisper back template but did not actually left me a msg on your talk page. Perhaps you've concern about this article. Earlier the submission was not written in compliance with Wikipedia neutral point of view hence deleted under G11 section of Speedy deletion criteria and later salted to protect the article from creation. I personally believe the given sources establish notability of the submission and it should be reviewed again and protection should be removed. I've left a comment on submission page to invite earlier reviewers to remove the protection. AnupMehra ✈ 16:22, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PROD

You must not add a PROD tag to an article if another PROD has ever been removed. Your only recourse is WP:AfD. Ryan Vesey 18:02, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Ayn Rand

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ayn Rand. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Audie Murphy

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Audie Murphy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: rejection of article on Wildfire Communications

Hi -- regarding this rejected article ... My friend (and, in the interest of full disclosure, fellow co-founder of the defunct company whose tech product is a progenitor of widely used systems today) had a fairly to-the-point article (I felt) which you rejected on the grounds that it read like an advertisement. The company is no longer in business, and only a 15+ year old version of the product is available for people to use. The issue might be that I personally added a link to one (the only? I don't know) company offering subscription service to the product any more. Is this the issue, or would it suffice to add more information on the product's functionality and how it is compared to modern systems such as Siri and Google Voice? Thanks in advance. DulcetTone (talk) 01:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@DulcetTone: The only issue is, the submission is not written in compliance with Wikipedia neutral point of view. For instance, ...product is still available from Virtuosity.com. Alternatively you can also see, How to write a better article. AnupMehra ✈ 17:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Can you explain why you find that sentence is not neutral? The product is still available from that supplier, and I am not aware of others. If you find that portion of the article is somehow promotional, I think it would be easy to remove it or make it less specific by omitting the one provider we know of. Thanks in advance for any more information on your finding. edit: oh and I will read the NPOV article, too... perhaps I'm guilty of not being proactive with the information you've already provided.DulcetTone (talk) 19:18, 18 October 2013 (UTC
@DulcetTone: Hello, please read WP:NPOV & WP:NOTADVERTISING. As you might have probably read those, It is unnecessary however I'd like to let you know that you could list similar kind of links under "External Links" section. And I'm not that much active on Wikipedia as earlier. So, I might reply late(even more than than present one. Sorry! but I can't help with this.). I'd suggest you to live chat and get your queries solved with more experienced Wikipedia editors and reviewers here. Also, the "Product Packaging and Deployment" section is unsourced. You should either provide references or simply remove them. AnupMehra ✈ 16:23, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALLEN Career Institute

Hi Anup Ji ! Hope you are doing well. I need your help in my article[Career Institute]. I have been waiting for comments from NawlinWiki but no response. Please guide me weather I need to edit the text for improvement.

Waiting in anticipation for your response.

Regards

Saxenanishank (talk) 06:36, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Saxenanishank: Hello! You can always make edits to improve your article. I'd suggest you to leave a message on NawlinWiki's talk page. The administrator who deleted the article and salted the page could only help here. And no 'Ji' please, just 'Anup' would be more than enough. Tx! AnupMehra ✈ 13:55, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Instant Wiki Page

Hi there.

You reviewed my first page for creation in September (Instant - Company). I did make a few changes as you suggested. Do you think the changes are sufficient? I'm waiting for another review, but in the meantime I would like to make sure that everything is correct. Many Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added byWednesday2013 (talk • contribs) 07:13, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Wednesday2013: Hello, I'd suggest you to provide the link of the particular submission about which talking you are. For now, I have got it from your talk page. The submission seems okay with some new updated additional sources. Here, Instant was the first organisation to produce......in 2011 requires citation. I'm not active onto Wikipedia as earlier, I'd request you to live chat with more experienced editors and reviewers here. AnupMehra ✈ 16:36, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Narkatiaganj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandragupta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:George Zimmerman

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:George Zimmerman. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please seesuggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Aaron Swartz. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Erika Winters document

Hi Anup, recently you reviewed my document regarding Erika Winters Bio, Ive been struggling to get the document posted but keeps on being rejected despite the changes made using the on line librarian help. I do truly need support in order to identify which parts should I take out or change. Any specific guidance will be truly appreciated. Thanks for the support Daniel --Levana2013 (talk) 16:07, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Levana2013: The references provided fails to establish notability of the subject of the submission. You need to show significant coverage of the subject of the article in reliable sources, like into some magazines, news papers, books, etc published online or offline. And, the article seems to be a biography of a living person, thus it requires additional citations for verification. Please see, Wikipedia guideline for biography of living person. I may reply late to your queries, I would suggest you to live chat with other editors and reviewers and get your queries solved instantly. However, you can always leave me a msg here. Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL, update and re-submit your article. Hope it helps. AnupMehra ✈ 10:49, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Peter Sellers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Peter Sellers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Talk:Mark Steyn

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Mark Steyn. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anupmehra/Archive1&oldid=1145077275"