Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Kraft

Daniel Kraft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article's vanispampuffery content is so high it could be nominated for speedy deletion as spam. References are to primary sources, nothing the subject does guarantees automatic notability, and a quick search of the internet reveals nothing to make him pass the GNG. I keep running into articles like this from Singularity University people, and I hope that's a coincidence. Drmies (talk) 02:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete With grudging compliments to the different SPAs that over the years have "maintained" this article: at first sight this looks like an impressive academic. Until you actually start reading... Lots of puffery, nothing of substance. --Randykitty (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That was my experience exactly. Drmies (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:09, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:10, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete He is a faculty member at an unaccredited university. Such people are very rarely notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:53, 20 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Teasing out the academic impact is made a bit harder as there is an homonym working at the Mayo Clinic and University of Minnesota, but the impact seems short of WP:Prof in any case. Going five SERPs deep, I could not find evidence satisfying WP:BIO either; some talks, but no WP:RS about the subject.Truth or consequences-2 (talk) 11:06, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]