Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rising Star Casino Resort

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (Non-admin closure)--180.172.239.231 (talk) 02:14, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Rising Star Casino Resort

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable business. Subject fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. No sources are cited, thus also failing WP:V. A Google turned up a large number of promotional hits plus a few run of the mill blurbs on business sites and PR announcements, but nothing that rings the notability bell. Article had been deleted via PROD but was recently restored with no evidence of improvement. Ad Orientem (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nom based on substantial improvements to the article that clearly satisfy both WP:N and WP:V. Suggest speedy close per WP:SK. -Ad Orientem (talk) 13:35, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:47, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unscintillating (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL) Unscintillating (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep ~~Delete~~ WP:N notable. ~~Fails WP:V.~~ Unscintillating (talk) 02:17, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:49, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:48, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There are plenty of sources available to satisfy GNG, I've added some to the article. Toohool (talk) 07:52, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.