Talk:Warren Beatty
Pro-life stance
I removed the following:
- After having children Beatty told the Drudge Report, "Since having children, I am pro-life."
I also removed a link that was pointing to a Hilary Clinton website for some unknown reason.
The Drudge Report did report that Beatty is pro-life, but it seems very biased to have this be the only political view mentioned in the article. If anything, Beatty is known for his leftest leanings. I would have no objection to returning the comment to a paragraph that fairly talks about his political activism and ideology. Until then, I think it should be out. --Samuel Wantman 08:40, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Why does it seem biased? It seems even more noteworthy given Beatty's well-known leftist activism. Does it make you unhappy to know that he is pro-life? (Personally I figure he probably just said it as a political maneuver in case he decides to run for office.)
Names
The article currently states that he was born "Henry Warren Beaty"; is this a typo, or was his last name originally spelled with only one "t"? It has two everywhere else in the article. --LostLeviathan 14:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC)
- The latter. His birth name was in fact Beaty. See also slightly more information at the page for his sister Shirley MacLaine, also born Beaty — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 05:17, May 23, 2005 (UTC)
Northwestern University
http://www.ugadm.northwestern.edu/alumni/facts/alumni.htm begins by saying:
- The following is a list of just some of our successful graduates, organized by their field of achievement.
The emphasis is mine. The following entry can be found about 1/4 the way down the page:
- Warren Beatty, actor, Academy Award-winning producer (Communication 59)
This looks like it means "Warren Beatty graduated from from Northwestern University in 1959 with a degree in communication studies." Does anybody have a source saying he dropped out? Is this an merely honorary degree? Or is he listed just for NU recruitment purposes without regard for accuracy? — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 17:10, 15 November 2005 (UTC)
Stable version discussion
This article gets very few edits; it seems like it would be a acceptable candidate for a stable version. I recomend we use the current version as of now (revision 62845012). JesseW, the juggling janitor 20:19, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert on the subject, but I don't see anything wrong with the current version. I've never edited the article myself; this presumably qualifies me as the "administrator who is largely uninvolved in the article otherwise" required by Wikipedia:Stable versions now. I support the creation of a stable version – Gurch 22:22, 9 July 2006 (UTC)