Vorticity equation

The vorticity equation of fluid dynamics describes evolution of the vorticity ω→ of a particle of a fluid as it moves with its flow, that is, the local rotation of the fluid (in terms of vector calculus this is the curl of the velocity field). The equation is:

${\begin{aligned}{\frac {D{\vec {\omega }}}{Dt}}&={\frac {\partial {\vec {\omega }}}{\partial t}}+({\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {\omega }}\\&=({\vec {\omega }}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {v}}-{\vec {\omega }}({\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {v}})+{\frac {1}{\rho ^{2}}}{\vec {\nabla }}\rho \times {\vec {\nabla }}p+{\vec {\nabla }}\times \left({\frac {{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot \tau }{\rho }}\right)+{\vec {\nabla }}\times {\vec {B}}\end{aligned}}$

where d/dt the total time derivative operator, also denoted by in capital D notation as D/Dt, v→ is the velocity field, ρ is the local fluid density, p is the local pressure, τ is the viscous stress tensor and B→ represents the sum of the external body forces. The first source term on the right hand side represents vortex stretching. The equation is valid in the absence of any concentrated torques and line forces, for a compressible Newtonian fluid.

In the case of incompressible (i.e. low Mach number) and isotropic fluids, with conservative body forces, the equation simplifies to the vorticity transport equation

${d{\vec {\omega }} \over dt}=({\vec {\omega }}\cdot \nabla ){\vec {v}}+\nu \nabla ^{2}{\vec {\omega }}$

where ν is the kinematic viscosity and ∇² is the Laplace operator.

This 3-D equation can be transformed to the simpler equation

${d{\vec {\omega }} \over dt}=\nu \nabla ^{2}{\vec {\omega }}$

because additional term is zero. This result at first has been received as a conjecture. It is already known for 1-D and 2-D cases. Then it has been confirmed by analogy. As we can see the 1-D, 2-D and 3-D Navier-Stokes equations in vector form are identical. If we apply the operator curl(also caled rot) these transformed Navier-Stokes equations are identical also. In that case after next transformation, by analogy, the 1-D, 2-D and 3-D vorticity transport equations in vector form must be identical too. This is only supposition by analogy. But this supposition is strictly proved by mathematical way as a result of the Navier –Stokes Second Exact Transformation.

Physical Interpretation

• The term dω→/dt on the left-hand side is the material derivative of the vorticity vector ω→. It describes the rate of change of vorticity (that is, the angular acceleration) of the fluid particle. This change can be attributed to unsteadiness in the flow (∂ω→/∂t, the unsteady term) or due to the motion of the fluid particle as it moves from one point to another (v→ ∙ (∇→ω→), the convection term).

• The term (ω→∙ ∇→) v→ on the right-hand side describes the stretching or tilting of vorticity due to the velocity gradients. Note that ∇→v→ is an order-2 tensor with nine components.

• The term ω→(∇→ ∙ v→) describes stretching of vorticity due to flow compressibility. It follows from the Navier-Stokes equation for continuity,namely

${\frac {\partial \rho }{\partial t}}+{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot (\rho {\vec {v}})=0$

or

${\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {v}}=-{\frac {1}{\rho }}{\frac {d\rho }{dt}}={\frac {1}{V}}{\frac {dV}{dt}}$

where V = 1/ρ is the specific volume of the fluid element. One can think of ∇→ ∙ V→ as a measure of flow compressibility. Sometimes the negative sign is included in the term.

• The term (1/ρ²)∇→ρ × ∇→p is the baroclinic term. It accounts for the changes in the vorticity due to the intersection of density and pressure surfaces.

• The term ∇→ × (∇→ ∙ τ/ρ), accounts for the diffusion of vorticity due to the viscous effects.

• The term ∇→ × B→ provides for changes due to external body forces. These are forces that are spread over a three-dimensional region of the fluid, such as gravity or electromagnetic forces. (As opposed to forces that act only over a surface (like drag on a wall) or a line (like surface tension around a meniscus).

Simplifications

• In case of conservative body forces, ∇→ × B→ = 0.
• For a barotropic fluid, ∇→ρ × ∇→p = 0. This is also true for a constant density fluid (including incompressible fluid) where ∇→ρ = 0. Note that this is not the same as an incompressible flow, for which the barotropic term cannot be neglected.
• For inviscid fluids, the viscosity tensor τ is zero.

Thus for an inviscid, barotropic fluid with conservative body forces, the vorticity equation simplifies to

${\frac {d}{dt}}\left({\frac {\vec {\omega }}{\rho }}\right)=\left(\left({\frac {\vec {\omega }}{\rho }}\right)\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}\right){\vec {v}}$

Alternately, in case of incompressible, inviscid fluid with conservative body forces,

${\frac {d{\vec {\omega }}}{dt}}=({\vec {\omega }}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {v}}$

For a brief review of additional cases and simplifications, see also.

Derivation

The vorticity equation can be derived from the Navier-Stokes equation for the conservation of angular momentum. In the absence of any concentrated torques and line forces, one obtains

${\frac {d{\vec {v}}}{dt}}={\frac {\partial {\vec {v}}}{\partial t}}+({\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {v}}=-{\frac {1}{\rho }}{\vec {\nabla }}p+{\vec {B}}+{\frac {{\vec {\nabla }}\cdot \tau }{\rho }}$

Now, vorticity is defined as the curl of the velocity vector. Taking curl of momentum equation yields the desired equation.

The following identities are useful in derivation of the equation,

${\vec {\omega }}={\vec {\nabla }}\times {\vec {v}}$

$({\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {v}}={\vec {\nabla }}({\tfrac {1}{2}}{\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {v}})-{\vec {v}}\times {\vec {\omega }}$

${\vec {\nabla }}\times ({\vec {v}}\times {\vec {\omega }})=-{\vec {\omega }}({\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {v}})+({\vec {\omega }}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {v}}-({\vec {v}}\cdot {\vec {\nabla }}){\vec {\omega }}$

${\vec {\nabla }}\times {\vec {\nabla }}\phi =0$, where ϕ is any scalar field.

${\vec {\nabla }}\cdot {\vec {\omega }}=0$

Tensor notation

The vorticity equation can be expressed in tensor notation using Einstein's summation convention and the Levi-Civita symbol e_ijk:

${\begin{aligned}{\frac {d\omega _{i}}{dt}}&={\frac {\partial \omega _{i}}{\partial t}}+v_{j}{\frac {\partial \omega _{i}}{\partial x_{j}}}\\&=\omega _{j}{\frac {\partial v_{i}}{\partial x_{j}}}-\omega _{i}{\frac {\partial v_{j}}{\partial x_{j}}}+e_{ijk}{\frac {1}{\rho ^{2}}}{\frac {\partial \rho }{\partial x_{j}}}{\frac {\partial p}{\partial x_{k}}}+e_{ijk}{\frac {\partial }{\partial x_{j}}}\left({\frac {1}{\rho }}{\frac {\partial \tau _{km}}{\partial x_{m}}}\right)+e_{ijk}{\frac {\partial B_{k}}{\partial x_{j}}}\end{aligned}}$

In specific sciences

Atmospheric sciences

In the atmospheric sciences, the vorticity equation can be stated in terms of the absolute vorticity of air with respect to an inertial frame, or of the vorticity with respect to the rotation of the Earth. The absolute version is

${\frac {d\eta }{dt}}=-\eta \nabla _{h}\cdot {\vec {v}}_{h}-\left({\frac {\partial \omega }{\partial x}}{\frac {\partial v}{\partial z}}-{\frac {\partial \omega }{\partial y}}{\frac {\partial u}{\partial z}}\right)-{\frac {1}{\rho ^{2}}}{\vec {k}}\cdot (\nabla _{h}p\times \nabla _{h}\rho )$

Here, η is the polar (z) component of the vorticity, ρ is the atmospheric density, u, v, and ω are the components of wind velocity, and ∇_h is the 2-dimensional (i.e. horizontal-component-only) del.

See also

• Vorticity
• Barotropic vorticity equation
• Vortex stretching
• Burgers vortex

References

• Utpal Manna and S. S. Sritharan (2007), "Lyapunov Functionals and Local Dissipativity for the Vorticity Equation in L^p and Besov spaces", Differential and Integral Equations, 20 (5): 581–598.
• V. Barbu and S. S. Sritharan, “M-accretive Quantization of the Vorticity Equation", in Semi-groups of Operators: Theory and Applications, edited by A. V. Balakrishnan, Birkhauser, Boston, 2000, pp. 296–303. http://www.nps.edu/Academics/Schools/GSEAS/SRI/BookCH12.pdf
• A. M. Krigel, "Vortex evolution", Geophysical, Astrophysical Fluid Dynamics, 1983, 24, pp. 213–223.
• Navier –Stokes Second Exact Transformation